"Butter Dance" aka "The Jezebel Shake": Interpretive Dance/Critical Theory gets worse
05-30-2014, 06:01 AM
.
BLUF, tl;dr: Red Pill theory is Critical Theory.
OP is confused.
I've said it here before, but the toolkit of Critical Theory can be applied to anything.
Red Pill is a form of Critical Theory, Critical Theory is a form of Red Pill.
Red Pill is just not acknowledged as Critical Theory because of ideological biases of both academic Critical Theorists (who are mostly feminists and leftists) and Red Pill exponents (who are reflexively anti-Critical Theory because Critical Theorists are mostly feminists and leftists).
What I did in the paragraph above was an exercise in Critical Theory.
Critical Theory at base is a recognition and examination of the biases and subjectivity of any interlocutor, and how those biases have contributed to social and economic structures which were previously unquestioned because of collective biases.
Sounds like Roosh, Roissy and Rollo Tomassi in particular with his extended "deconstruction" of the Feminine Imperative. In the terminology of Critical Theory, the Feminine Imperative as explained by Rollo is a "hegemonic" structure.
While many recent Critical Theorists publish inane pablum (because of their own biases, of course), I recommend Foucault in particular for realistic Red Pill examination about sex, society, and surveillance.
I've never seen a critique of Critical Theory or the Frankfurt School which displayed any
real knowledge of what the major theorists of those movements actually wrote. It's all shit just parroted from blogs.
BLUF, tl;dr: Red Pill theory is Critical Theory.
OP is confused.
I've said it here before, but the toolkit of Critical Theory can be applied to anything.
Red Pill is a form of Critical Theory, Critical Theory is a form of Red Pill.
Red Pill is just not acknowledged as Critical Theory because of ideological biases of both academic Critical Theorists (who are mostly feminists and leftists) and Red Pill exponents (who are reflexively anti-Critical Theory because Critical Theorists are mostly feminists and leftists).
What I did in the paragraph above was an exercise in Critical Theory.
Critical Theory at base is a recognition and examination of the biases and subjectivity of any interlocutor, and how those biases have contributed to social and economic structures which were previously unquestioned because of collective biases.
Sounds like Roosh, Roissy and Rollo Tomassi in particular with his extended "deconstruction" of the Feminine Imperative. In the terminology of Critical Theory, the Feminine Imperative as explained by Rollo is a "hegemonic" structure.
While many recent Critical Theorists publish inane pablum (because of their own biases, of course), I recommend Foucault in particular for realistic Red Pill examination about sex, society, and surveillance.
I've never seen a critique of Critical Theory or the Frankfurt School which displayed any
real knowledge of what the major theorists of those movements actually wrote. It's all shit just parroted from blogs.