[Excelsior]

(07-04-2011 11:47 PM)UrbanNerd Wrote:  

No.

I direct my attention to women using whatever will maximize my output (sex) with the minimal input. With some jailbait, I am not trying to deal with constant mind-changing, quirkiness, a whole bunch of teasing/playing just to sway her or holla at her just because she is hit on 100 other times that somehow proves her worth (supposedly).

I want say what I need to say to her once, not trying to outdo cell phones, text messages or social networks. As one poster alluded to, YES I exploit what has been drilled into girls minds (young and old), the 'ole provider slant. Give them the "illusion" of house, picket fence and a dog and capitalize from that. No need for many of these silly details that are posted on this board. No need to bench-press 500 pounds and wear tight "smedium" (small/medium) shirts to show muscles and definitely no need to analyze everything in terms of alpha, omega, beta and gamma (if there is a gamma) which I don't even read that stuff anyway.

Now if she picks up that tab?...that's a plus.

I noticed you didn't address the other questions in my post...interesting.

Alright, so your reasoning for not dealing with young women isn't entirely without basis. It is true that younger girls can be quite flaky and flighty, and a bit harder to lay than more mature women who just get to the point. Older women can also easily be fooled with the beta-provider game that you run(I've proposed that as a useful strategy as well).

The thing is, if this is all true, why did you feel the need to shame guys who do pursue younger women by saying things like this:

(06-30-2011 08:52 AM)UrbanNerd Wrote:  

I mean you are 25, 26 or 27 and aiming for 17/18 year olds?...Really?

And this:

(06-30-2011 08:52 AM)UrbanNerd Wrote:  

Most guys that continually aim for much younger GIRLS, especially the guys ages 20 to 29 who want some TEEN girl do it because they really do not want to challenged mentally.

You could have just outlined the reasons why you thought younger girls provided a poor return on investment and been done. Instead you used shaming language, called them suckers, and made it seem as though they were weak, stupid, immature and just wrong for making that choice not to pursue women of your more favored, mature age group.

Why is that?

And one more thing regarding this particular statement here:

(06-30-2011 08:52 AM)UrbanNerd Wrote:  

the guys ages 20 to 29 who want some TEEN girl do it because they really do not want to challenged mentally.

Aside from the fact that this is blatant shaming, it seems to contradict your later statements here:

(07-04-2011 11:47 PM)UrbanNerd Wrote:  

I direct my attention to women using whatever will maximize my output (sex) with the minimal input. With some jailbait, I am not trying to deal with constant mind-changing, quirkiness, a whole bunch of teasing/playing just to sway her or holla at her just because she is hit on 100 other times that somehow proves her worth (supposedly).

You then go on to specifically outline the relative simplicity of older women as a benefit of pursuing them("I want to say what I need to say to her once").

It seems here that you are acknowledging the ability of young women to provide a pretty strong mental challenge to the men who try to pursue them due to their flighty, game-playing nature. You also seem to be admitting that older women are less challenging("maximize output(sex)...minimal input") to get with. This is odd considering the fact that you just finished labeling men who pursue younger women as guys who "don't want to be challenged".

So which is it? Are young women challenging, or are they not? Because, judging from what you've said, it appears as though you may be the one taking the easier road.

Mind you, I do not disagree with that philosophy-maximizing return on investment, which you seem to be aiming to do, is a key philosophy of mine as well when it comes to women. I simply disagree with the way you presented the argument, as it is rather unclear.