[Smooth Operator]

(02-07-2014 03:37 PM)SwayMe Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 12:43 PM)Smooth Operator Wrote:  

If I look at your examples, your definition of high value = high value job. Many (not all!) of these guys with high value jobs are not high value guys, i.e. they are beta or become beta in the company of a nice girl. They can be alpha in their job, and beta outside their business. And often they lack game, because they don't need it as they can attract golddiggers with ease.

High value job means money interesting lifestyle, contacts, fame , non-needy ....
High social value is enough to be attractive and they don't lack game because they can rely on GD like your statements suggests.
Many of them have game since their job demands leadership qualities which are alpha traits.
In other words they've got an attractive package. That's what you need for SHBs.

They are still your competition Period! Believe or not.
If she's on a date with you her first question will be: "Can I see myself with this guy?". Women want to date up the social hierarchy. She wants a guy with higher social value than her. No this is no myth.

Wow dude chill briefly, I never said they're not my competition. And don't put words in my mouth, I never said it's a myth that they want to date up the social hierarchy. You're totally twisting what I've said.

(02-07-2014 03:37 PM)SwayMe Wrote:  

(02-07-2014 12:43 PM)Smooth Operator Wrote:  

I know models that flew all over the world for shoots and catwalks, finalists of miss contest of their country, a hot news presenter, etc. all single for very long stretches and very willing to have a boyfriend.
Doesn't mean that they are not fucking around. But if there would be so much high value competition, they should at least be able to pin one of them down for a relationship, and that's not what I'm seeing in real life...

With this amount of traveling it's hard and do the guys always want the same are they really compatible? There are too many reasons that have nothing to do with pu.
One call and they have someone at their place (no snl).

You're nitpicking on one example I gave, and I said "flew" (past) and not "is flying" (present). And it's not because a model has to fly from time to time that you can't be together, been there done that.

I stop posting in this threat: we don't need to agree + we're getting off topic...