[AneroidOcean]

(10-01-2013 10:45 PM)Therapsid Wrote:  

I always find it interesting the extent to which guys are willing to live with risk, albeit low risk, and in exchange for what cost (wearing a condom).

I'm going to use a condom with SNL every single time because I don't want some random chick to get pregnant or pass on some STD.

But I guess guys are more blase about this shit because the odds are strongly against it. The odds are against girls keeping a fetus they got from some guy they don't even know and the odds are against her passing on anything serious.

Cool, but I'd rather make that probability close to zero by using a condom. The male equivalent to buyer's remorse is wondering if you could have impregnated a broad or picked up something nasty.

But then again, I don't mind wearing condoms to begin with, so it's not much of a trade-off for me.

It may not be a popular opinion, but I feel the same way. Most guys are lazy and don't have much principles when it comes to this topic. Me, you can remove STDs entirely from the equation and I still don't want to have the slight possibility that I'm going to impregnate a chick and get stuck with 18+ years of financial responsibility for a kid I might not ever get much involvement with. Quality condoms are .20 each when purchased in quantity and at a VERY conservative 200k number for the overall lifetime cost of a kid, you're talking about a single condom being one MILLIONTH of the cost of the kid.

I don't know about you guys, but that math sure makes the feel of a super thin condom on my dick damn worthwhile.