Ethicists Argue in Favor of ‘After-Birth Abortions’ as Newborns ‘Are Not Persons
07-16-2013, 06:31 PM
I really cannot fathom how betaness translates to influencing a man's speech and thoughts like this.
The man who redraws the line to favor a woman's choice is a deferring beta by definition.
And it's a stretch to assume he is getting laid by writing scientific journals.
So I can only assume its more ominous: he is getting paid to pursue these kind of thoughts.
The case of the Greeks is a great example of the point I want to make.. Men ordered the destruction of infants that were unfit because the fate of a warring city-state depended on it. Survival of the civilization depended on it.
The man who redraws the line to favor a woman's choice is a deferring beta by definition.
And it's a stretch to assume he is getting laid by writing scientific journals.
So I can only assume its more ominous: he is getting paid to pursue these kind of thoughts.
The case of the Greeks is a great example of the point I want to make.. Men ordered the destruction of infants that were unfit because the fate of a warring city-state depended on it. Survival of the civilization depended on it.