Quote: (02-14-2013 11:29 PM)kosko Wrote:
Porn fucks with your head. I am sorry to be a sorry suzy but I am way to deep into porn, and have been for way to long to not sit here and say it has negatively fuked up the deep and back wiring of my brain.
I support this shit. I will do everything I can to keep my son away from digital porn. The static magazines and shitty VHS tapes of the past where not the same. The ability to process the multi-amounts of images/frames so quickly where hindered by the lag in technology in the past. Physically having to fast-forward through a video, or physically turn pages was enough delay to temper the mind and slow down the stimulating pulses. But no more as now now with digital video, ultra niche stuff its all out the window. I've been hit with damage no different then a heavy drug user, elements of my brain are fried up like jerky and its lowest points deeply affected my real sexual life in my ability to legit enjoy real sex.
Its not a game.
I support this. Iceland is 10 steps ahead on that the right path. Let it go back underground, if people want it so bad let them jump through the hoop. Fucked up dudes still go after kiddie porn, people going to do what makes them happy but from my own experience and just seeing the trends and noticing what it has done to others as well I am 100% convinced Porn is simply a soft weapon against Men. I don;t buy the bullshit of it being such a thing against women, they are getting compensated and know 100% what they are getting into. Its a front to say its about protecting women because governments have done nothing to close sex-trade and human trafficking links that have even more direct damage to safety and welfare of Women. Governments around the world actively collude to expand and limit sex-trafficking via overt open Government immigration polices, and covert collusion with the illegal elements/black market. To me it does more damage to the consumers of the product then the ones whom produce it.
I don't deny it has harmful effects but it seems too extreme to ask big daddy government come in and protect people from themselves by taking away everyone else's freedom to view porn. This is the same argument used to justify restrictions on weed and other drugs, alcohol, sugar, fast food, etc. The argument is even weaker in the case of porn since the harmful externalities are much less (no road accidents, public health care costs). People should be responsible for developing their own healthy habits and, if they can't, the state should just make sure their bad habits don't harm other people.
And this sets a dangerous precedent of regulating content on the internet. The fact that they are following the example of China should have raised some red flags. Of course, the next step will be to filter any speech that is "sexist" or "racist" and soon you'll have no more freedom of speech on the internet than you have on a typical college campus. That Lebanese girl Roosh trolled would actually have legal recourse. It would be very easy for these same fringe leftists to argue that the entire "manosphere" "victimizes" women and seek to restrict it like porn.