Quote: (12-16-2012 06:58 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:
I don't believe that most (or even a third or fifth of) these guys dressing in leggings and other fucked up articles ever get laid, even with hipster girls. The female desire for dominance is biological and can't be overruled so easily, and I don't see how a guy who literally puts effort into looking more like a female can ever be dominant. Maybe in spite of it, never because of it. Maybe if he has enormous social status (such as famous singer or actor), but those are rare exceptions. In general, it would be almost impossible for these guys to be getting laid because of it. They're usually just Lesser Betas/Omegas.
Notice that the nobleman in Norset's picture still looks visibly male, dominant and strong, as compared to, say, the 2nd guy in Houston's post #58.
Ya, you'd think so. There is nothing in your theory that I'd disagree with.
Its the data that's pesky.
I agree, we don't have a handy explanation for the data yet.
Maybe it's about peacocking. But I completely agree that peacocking with a feminine affectation seems too strange to work. Pesky data.