We need money to stay online, if you like the forum, donate! x

rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one. x


Eastern Europe vs South America
#37

Eastern Europe vs South America

Quote: (10-27-2010 02:46 AM)zanetti Wrote:  

IME the smarter a girl is, the more mannish she becomes

look at girls that work in law firms, banks etc - even the few ones that look ok have taken on all sorts of masculine mannerisms

zanetti, as far as the women in 1st world, I absolutely agree with you. Professions to look out for: Lawyers ( obviously) . As far back as Nietzsche people have noticed this: He said something like academic women have something sexually wrong with them. This can be sometimes true, but there are younger generations ( Canadian girls I went to grad school with) who just wanted to have a decent job and were DTF and even were subs. ( Another post about my Beta Slut behavior around here somewhere.)

But from my five trips there, the fact that an elegant, nurturing femininity is respected among intelligent Russian women is the whole reason I've spent thousands and thousands of dollars to go there.

Russia is behind in efficiency and government transparency, but there are some ways in which their culture is just simply and plainly completely better than ours.

1) Russian women feel like men can be partners in life, not competitors.

2) To lust after attractive women is not a weakness, it is perfectly normal. I had a Russian female friend who was helping me pick Russian women to meet ( online dating site) and I was sort of apologising for picking only the best looking ones. She didn't seem to understand my reasoning, she commented that if I didn't want the pretty ones, it would mean I needed a psychologist. ( Knowing I was something like one.)

3) Russians have some deceptively simple metaphor about men and women having to do with "head" and "neck." I think the idea is to describe a non-equal ( the idiotic premise of feminism, not the reasonable stuff like equal pay for equal work.) model of male-femal cooperation.

I think it goes like this-- Woman is the neck and man is the head, the woman supports the man and gives him direction, but the man decides on action and is the final leader.

Beautiful: Non-equivalent, but cooperative roles. It fits the FACTS of how we're wired, and so does not lead to insoluble, pointless competition between mismatched opponents. ( There is are no female Beethovens, Melvilles, Einsteins, Hitlers, Michaelangelos, Shakepeares, etc.) It is idiotic to try to postulate equivalency between men and women.

And since intelligence is about 50% hereditary, do you really want your offspring to revert to the mean because you don't like smart women.
Smart women are okay. They don't believe in a bizarre, unrealistic idea like misandrist feminism. That would be a academic, pseudo-intellectual, out of touch with the physical facts in front of them all through history.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)