http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/books...ewed_.html
summary:
Woman writes shitty book with pseudo intellectual premise. Not quite fiction, not quite person memoir, not quite...anything. Doesn't fall into a genre, WOW, thought provoking. It's been done.
Book fails to get published from male publishing agent. She finds a woman to publish it.
Well known male reviewer trashes it.
Slate article claims these, "smart, serious men" have misunderstood the book, and have "gotten in its way."
Article is written by obvious feminist, praising the book's "art".
Don't these dumb bitches realize how transparent it all is? Christ almighty, there are plenty of female authors who get published by and write books that are well reviewed by men. BUT when well known publishers and reviewers don't like a book, WELL, then they just don't understand it or they're getting in the way. It would be one thing to leave it at that, BUT to emphasize the fact that the publisher and reviewer are men...
![[Image: womanhamster.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/womanhamster.gif)
summary:
Woman writes shitty book with pseudo intellectual premise. Not quite fiction, not quite person memoir, not quite...anything. Doesn't fall into a genre, WOW, thought provoking. It's been done.
Book fails to get published from male publishing agent. She finds a woman to publish it.
Well known male reviewer trashes it.
Slate article claims these, "smart, serious men" have misunderstood the book, and have "gotten in its way."
Article is written by obvious feminist, praising the book's "art".
Don't these dumb bitches realize how transparent it all is? Christ almighty, there are plenty of female authors who get published by and write books that are well reviewed by men. BUT when well known publishers and reviewers don't like a book, WELL, then they just don't understand it or they're getting in the way. It would be one thing to leave it at that, BUT to emphasize the fact that the publisher and reviewer are men...