The problem with this is that you're gonna need a large dataset to draw meaningful conclusions. By the time you reach a large enough dataset, you've most likely already improved so much that your data isn't an accurate representation anymore.
As an example, lets say you approach 100 girls and end up banging 1 of them. That's a 1% "conversion rate". Then, you approach 100 more girls and end up banging 5 of them, reaching a 5% rate. But taking the total sample of 200 girls and 6 bangs, you'd have a 3% conversion. So what is your actual conversion rate now?
What if you hit a lucky streak and bang the next 3 girls you approach? Are you gonna be like "WOW MY CONVERSION RATE JUST SKYROCKETED! I AM ELITE!"
My point is, I think it is good to keep track of your approaches, but stop focusing on hard numbers. Instead, write down how it went and analyze the good and bad parts. You can even start an approach log in the newbie section where members will give feedback if you're serious about it. Even the veterans on this forum hit bad streaks. It happens and its no big deal, just keep going and you'll be rewarded for your efforts.
As an example, lets say you approach 100 girls and end up banging 1 of them. That's a 1% "conversion rate". Then, you approach 100 more girls and end up banging 5 of them, reaching a 5% rate. But taking the total sample of 200 girls and 6 bangs, you'd have a 3% conversion. So what is your actual conversion rate now?
What if you hit a lucky streak and bang the next 3 girls you approach? Are you gonna be like "WOW MY CONVERSION RATE JUST SKYROCKETED! I AM ELITE!"
My point is, I think it is good to keep track of your approaches, but stop focusing on hard numbers. Instead, write down how it went and analyze the good and bad parts. You can even start an approach log in the newbie section where members will give feedback if you're serious about it. Even the veterans on this forum hit bad streaks. It happens and its no big deal, just keep going and you'll be rewarded for your efforts.