[quote] (08-03-2018 11:49 PM)UniversalMen Wrote:
[quote='Steelex' pid='1829166' dateline='1533329825']
Open your eyes and read what I wrote.
I didn't say he was bad. I even said he was great.
But with that said, there are also lots of people who have success with other methods.[/quote]
No, understood what you're saying. I have just grown to only back scientifically accepted studies.
How much science do you think is really devoted to building a bigger, more ripped, better athlete? Do you think the scientific community is really focused on getting jacked and ripped?? No.
When it comes to something like this, anecdotal evidence and experience is way more valuable than fitness "science". Just look around, plenty of beasts train in plenty of different ways. Different genetics, different training, different diets, different use of pharmaceuticals. Many of those ways don't have a scientific study to back them.
If science was the key, layne Norton would look like Jeff cavalier.
[quote='Steelex' pid='1829166' dateline='1533329825']
Open your eyes and read what I wrote.
I didn't say he was bad. I even said he was great.
But with that said, there are also lots of people who have success with other methods.[/quote]
No, understood what you're saying. I have just grown to only back scientifically accepted studies.
How much science do you think is really devoted to building a bigger, more ripped, better athlete? Do you think the scientific community is really focused on getting jacked and ripped?? No.
When it comes to something like this, anecdotal evidence and experience is way more valuable than fitness "science". Just look around, plenty of beasts train in plenty of different ways. Different genetics, different training, different diets, different use of pharmaceuticals. Many of those ways don't have a scientific study to back them.
If science was the key, layne Norton would look like Jeff cavalier.