The Top 10 US MSAs (assuming that's what they used - can't find a link to actual survey)
1. NYC
2. LA
3. Chi
4. DFW
5. Phili
6. Houston
7. DC
8. Miami
9. Atl
10. Boston
I don't buy the survey. I can see DC being good for women, but BOSTON the worst? That doesn't add up.![[Image: dodgy.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/dodgy.gif)
The worst place for women should be places full of gorgeous girls and guys with no game, poor, short (yeah sorry, I know mentioning this angers everyone on this forum including its owner, but it matters a lot when you don't have game), and generally unattractive. Boston simply does not qualify under these criteria. Atlanta, DFW, Houston, and Chicago EASILY beat Boston in that regard just by quality of women alone. NYC also qualifies if you get rid of poor.
DC sucks, I won't dispute that. You should not go out of your way for it for women by any means. But there are worse major US cities to be stuck in if your priority is women. SF Bay (the home of Man Jose) and Denver (aka Menver and the land of ski-bums with trust funds) immediately come to mind.
Women have a funny way of rationalizing how great things are for them even when they are not. A few years ago I read through college guides that surveyed actual students at the actual schools (http://collegeprowler.com/ - ratings may have changed since then and I can't vouch for them now). Girls gave great ratings for guys at schools they flat out should not have, such as UGA. I remember reading the FSU guide giving the guys a high rating, even though when I visited they were anything but compared to the men of Toronto. I suspect that is what is happening here.
I'm not advocating that this forum should talk up DC. I just worry sometimes that it may encourage guys to go to another area in the United States, Canada, or NW Europe that just because it has other amenities such as skiing or great weather that will leave them even more frustrated with women. I speak from painful experience.
1. NYC
2. LA
3. Chi
4. DFW
5. Phili
6. Houston
7. DC
8. Miami
9. Atl
10. Boston
I don't buy the survey. I can see DC being good for women, but BOSTON the worst? That doesn't add up.
The worst place for women should be places full of gorgeous girls and guys with no game, poor, short (yeah sorry, I know mentioning this angers everyone on this forum including its owner, but it matters a lot when you don't have game), and generally unattractive. Boston simply does not qualify under these criteria. Atlanta, DFW, Houston, and Chicago EASILY beat Boston in that regard just by quality of women alone. NYC also qualifies if you get rid of poor.
DC sucks, I won't dispute that. You should not go out of your way for it for women by any means. But there are worse major US cities to be stuck in if your priority is women. SF Bay (the home of Man Jose) and Denver (aka Menver and the land of ski-bums with trust funds) immediately come to mind.
Women have a funny way of rationalizing how great things are for them even when they are not. A few years ago I read through college guides that surveyed actual students at the actual schools (http://collegeprowler.com/ - ratings may have changed since then and I can't vouch for them now). Girls gave great ratings for guys at schools they flat out should not have, such as UGA. I remember reading the FSU guide giving the guys a high rating, even though when I visited they were anything but compared to the men of Toronto. I suspect that is what is happening here.
I'm not advocating that this forum should talk up DC. I just worry sometimes that it may encourage guys to go to another area in the United States, Canada, or NW Europe that just because it has other amenities such as skiing or great weather that will leave them even more frustrated with women. I speak from painful experience.