Quote: (03-02-2012 06:36 AM)P Dog Wrote:
Quote: (02-26-2012 11:49 PM)Blackhawk Wrote:
Most people aren't even aware of the current immigration levels and how much higher they are than historically was accepted.
Most voters in the US when asked don't want to eliminate immigration, but would like to see immigration levels reduced to a rate of 100,000 to 200,000 immigrants per year, not the current rate of 1 million+ per year.
http://www.npg.org/facts/us_imm_decade.htm
I'm not really comfortable with this 2nd chart source, but it's the only one I could find with projections for this century's immigration levels. They do agree with the wikipedia numbers that I found.
http://www.cairco.org/data/data_us.html
The data in those graphs is skewed because it displays immigration in absolute rather than relative terms. The U.S had a population of around 76 million in 1901 compared to 248 million in 1990, which means that proportionally legal immigration had a greater impact on American demographics 110 years ago then it has now.
![[Image: chart_1.gif]](http://www.npg.org/Assets/Images/immpop_growth/chart_1.gif)
![[Image: chart1.gif]](http://www.cairco.org/images/chart1.gif)
The people coming in 110 years ago were much more similar to the native population than they are now.
Contributor at Return of Kings. I got banned from twatter, which is run by little bitches and weaklings. You can follow me on Gab.
Be sure to check out the easiest mining program around, FreedomXMR.