^
". As opposed to some girl saying "ugh, I gotta stop doing this..." and then you do NOT feel special."
Who the fuck cares if you feel special?
"I'm just arrogant"
Then he will have no one to blame but himself when he "finds out" his girl is a fucking whore, even though that lesson was taught on that first night.
All the cheerleaders in this thread are playing right into the hands of these types of women. They want you to believe something and you eat it up with a spoon.
When you bang a chick or are dating a chick, she has incentive to both:
1. Believe you're the shit
and
2. Convince you she thinks you're the shit.
It's a retroactive form of ASD.
The original question posited is an interesting one because it seems we've come back to the question asked a lot by the members of the 'sphere, that being, do women have agency or don't they? It's either one or the other and the argument could be made their the dual positions society takes on this question has royally fucked things up.
The responses here saying that their game is just so on point that the chick had no choice but to put out right then and there are tacitly saying that women have no agency. Of course in other threads about how to find a good girl or wife hunting, chastity is of the utmost importance.
The two positions are incompatible. If the ho you bang on the first night is LTR material, because hey your game was too good to deny, then clearly the virgin Muslim unicorn would have to follow the same script.
So then I predict the argument that would follow would be something like "But Pillage!! My muslim unicorn WOULDN'T DO THAT! She has morals n stuff!"
To which I point to my original position...agency or no agency? Can't have it both ways. By that logic you should be able to run tight game on the unicorn and she'd have no choice but to comply, which throws the whole "importance of chastity" thing out the window.
". As opposed to some girl saying "ugh, I gotta stop doing this..." and then you do NOT feel special."
Who the fuck cares if you feel special?
"I'm just arrogant"
Then he will have no one to blame but himself when he "finds out" his girl is a fucking whore, even though that lesson was taught on that first night.
All the cheerleaders in this thread are playing right into the hands of these types of women. They want you to believe something and you eat it up with a spoon.
When you bang a chick or are dating a chick, she has incentive to both:
1. Believe you're the shit
and
2. Convince you she thinks you're the shit.
It's a retroactive form of ASD.
The original question posited is an interesting one because it seems we've come back to the question asked a lot by the members of the 'sphere, that being, do women have agency or don't they? It's either one or the other and the argument could be made their the dual positions society takes on this question has royally fucked things up.
The responses here saying that their game is just so on point that the chick had no choice but to put out right then and there are tacitly saying that women have no agency. Of course in other threads about how to find a good girl or wife hunting, chastity is of the utmost importance.
The two positions are incompatible. If the ho you bang on the first night is LTR material, because hey your game was too good to deny, then clearly the virgin Muslim unicorn would have to follow the same script.
So then I predict the argument that would follow would be something like "But Pillage!! My muslim unicorn WOULDN'T DO THAT! She has morals n stuff!"
To which I point to my original position...agency or no agency? Can't have it both ways. By that logic you should be able to run tight game on the unicorn and she'd have no choice but to comply, which throws the whole "importance of chastity" thing out the window.
"Does PUA say that I just need to get to f-close base first here and some weird chemicals will be released in her brain to make her a better person?"
-Wonitis