Quote: (10-16-2016 01:40 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:
Quote: (10-16-2016 01:01 PM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:
I'd say most of the guys here think that they can pick right, maintain frame or whatever nonsense, or build themselves up so that a chick has no realistic options.
Maybe it's an age thing, or an experience thing, but those strategies fail over and over. They have failed for me, failed for my peers, failed for our fathers, grandfathers, and forefathers.
You really think that women were this slutty all throughout history? You really think that our grandfathers and forefathers had as hard a time as the current generation of men in finding a quality woman who was faithful?
You don't think that the hook-up culture and the 1960s "cultural revolution" forever changed our society, or that giving women the vote fucked us over for good?
Adultery was in the Bible.
Divorce laws used to be that if a woman was discovered fucking around, she wouldn't get anything.
You think women just discovered dick?
Using your logic, men were even more MANLY back in the past.
It was probably much worse.
The only difference between hypergamy of 2016 and 1956 is that sex is now much more out in the open. But American/Canadian/British/Aussie/Kiwi finds their morality on sex with the repressed Victorians.
The French don't think like this. Germans neither.
If you come through the game to learn about the nature of women, it's whatever.
If you come through the red pill to learn about the nature of women, THE END IS NIGH.
WIA