Quote: (07-12-2016 12:38 PM)Yatagan Wrote:
Quote: (07-12-2016 10:30 AM)Snowplow Wrote:
Quote: (07-11-2016 06:11 PM)Yatagan Wrote:
We hear so much about this cuckold fetish, but how popular is the reverse? The Cuckquean one?
It's out there, just not of big of a thing. Although I'm always on the look out for a girl into it.
You'd think it'd be more prevalent given how women aren't all that concerned about the physical aspect of cheating, but about losing the man's commitment. That and I presume the kind of women that are into that sort of thing would be getting off on how much of a stud their bf/husband is and how only *she* is the one that he commits to at the end of the day.
RE: the topic at hand with this interracial cuckold stuff, I always got the impression that there was some strong racist undertones to the whole thing. That these white men get off on how "dirty" it is for their wives to be banging men they consider "beneath them".
I agree with you about the logic would seem to allow women to be more accepting of
a "Cuckquean" situation, so long as in the end of the day, the chick still has the guy.
Regarding finding a guy "beneath them," I have the sense that the guy is generally o.k. with another dominant male, and even though socially, he may consider the guy beneath him, that "beneath him" status really could not seem to be a very powerful dynamic when the guy is dominantly placing his penis in his wife ... I mean, sure, maybe there could be some kind of request that the bull stops if the husband asks for him to stop, but probably most bulls would not agree to such a condition and may even not comply with such a "stop" request if it were made at an inopportune time.