![[Image: 11182491_ori.jpg]](http://resizing.flixster.com/eLymnUUWesSRS4TktWve5ACHgO0=/284x405/dkpu1ddg7pbsk.cloudfront.net/movie/11/18/24/11182491_ori.jpg)
One of the more fascinating adventures a person can have by themselves is seeing how they viewed the world in a different time. Reviewing fiction provides a great avenue for this as you can pen your take on a particular work and revisit it years later to see what jumped out at you or what attracted your interest.
Recently, I have been dipping in and out of the litany of threads I cobbled together in the spring and summer of 2013. Missing words and questionable grammar aside, it is a great pleasure to see my assumptions, thought patterns and perception of the world as seen through my reviews of movies and TV shows.
As far as Fatso is concerned, I still don't know what exactly animates the spirit of the nice guy. I wholly reject any biological explanation for the phenomena. These soft men are most assuredly products of their historical time. I think this is a good -- but flawed and needlessly wordy -- attempt at trying to split the issue apart. Manosphere mind-rot and pseudo-psychical jargon aside, this was a solid effort.
BTW -- that Robert Glover book is much better at explaining the relationship between modern men and societal phenomena than it is at helping them overcoming the effects of said phenomena.