I think most homophobia is actually derived from feminism.
How do gays make their case for social acceptability? They talk about monogamous love and marriage.
But in reality they fuck around as often as straight men would if women had a male sex drive.
So, who are they actually trying to win over, here? Are they reassuring straight men that they won't have too much sex?
Or have they fallen into the same trap as straight men?
Oscar Wilde, gay sex fiend, was married and had two children. Do you think he cared about feminism?
The men who said, "oh, his poor wife, we must prosecute him" were early feminists.
The other case they make is that they were born that way - monogamously gay.
A switch just flipped that caused them to be exclusively attracted to men - I don't believe that.
It's just more squeaky clean monogamy talk, designed to appease women.
Kill monogamy, and homosexuals vanish into the general population. There would be a few eccentrics who won't touch women, but no pozzed ghettoes.
Because of the law of monogamy, any straight man accused of gayness is being threatened with celibacy.
The gays are sucking up to women because the straights are, too; meanwhile, feminists use homosexuality as a shit test.
Object too much, and you're a closet case.
Object too little, and you have to accept that some men can be permanently banished from straight sex.
(This is why we are so often uncomfortable around gays. They are uncanny, eunuch-like.)
You never hear this point made, but you know it to be true. Why else are schoolboys so afraid of the label?
It's worth thinking about. Who does the banishing? Who benefits from more competition between men? Who benefits from restraining the male sex drive?
How do gays make their case for social acceptability? They talk about monogamous love and marriage.
But in reality they fuck around as often as straight men would if women had a male sex drive.
So, who are they actually trying to win over, here? Are they reassuring straight men that they won't have too much sex?
Or have they fallen into the same trap as straight men?
Oscar Wilde, gay sex fiend, was married and had two children. Do you think he cared about feminism?
The men who said, "oh, his poor wife, we must prosecute him" were early feminists.
The other case they make is that they were born that way - monogamously gay.
A switch just flipped that caused them to be exclusively attracted to men - I don't believe that.
It's just more squeaky clean monogamy talk, designed to appease women.
Kill monogamy, and homosexuals vanish into the general population. There would be a few eccentrics who won't touch women, but no pozzed ghettoes.
Because of the law of monogamy, any straight man accused of gayness is being threatened with celibacy.
The gays are sucking up to women because the straights are, too; meanwhile, feminists use homosexuality as a shit test.
Object too much, and you're a closet case.
Object too little, and you have to accept that some men can be permanently banished from straight sex.
(This is why we are so often uncomfortable around gays. They are uncanny, eunuch-like.)
You never hear this point made, but you know it to be true. Why else are schoolboys so afraid of the label?
It's worth thinking about. Who does the banishing? Who benefits from more competition between men? Who benefits from restraining the male sex drive?