An hour into the Podcast, and Rogan's damage is really shining through: he thinks gays are just like you and me and want to settle down and marry into monogamy (00's liberalism); he thinks you shouldn't expect a 35-year-old men to have maturity or life direction (00's liberalism); he thinks it's normal that people present fake narcissistic constructs to hook each other into a relationship (10's liberalism); he thinks it's good that people don't breed because we're overpopulated (70's liberalism); and he doesn't seem to believe women have trouble conceiving after 35 (90's liberalism).
This is the danger of a man getting too comfortable and privileged in his life, and living in a city surrounded by Progressives. The pot doesn't help.
The deeper problem is that he has a huge audience who thinks he's a Real Man giving them Real Talk, when his counterarguments wouldn't be out of place on Jezebel. It's back to the Esquire Branding again: "He's X, but not too X."
This is the danger of a man getting too comfortable and privileged in his life, and living in a city surrounded by Progressives. The pot doesn't help.
The deeper problem is that he has a huge audience who thinks he's a Real Man giving them Real Talk, when his counterarguments wouldn't be out of place on Jezebel. It's back to the Esquire Branding again: "He's X, but not too X."