Body Describer Table Chart - Printable Version
+- Roosh V Forum (https://rooshvforum.network)
+-- Forum: Main (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Game (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Body Describer Table Chart (/thread-25268.html)
+- Roosh V Forum (https://rooshvforum.network)
+-- Forum: Main (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Game (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-2.html)
+--- Thread: Body Describer Table Chart (/thread-25268.html)
Pages:
1
2
Body Describer Table Chart - xmlenigma - 06-27-2013
Not sure if you guys had seen this.
http://www.taglol.com/meme/girls-body-sizes/9363/
![[Image: 1367523864.jpg]](http://im.skdat.com/data/gags/1367523864.jpg)
Body Describer Table Chart - Gopher - 06-27-2013
Yea the problem is that girls in categories 4,5,6 prefer to use the title curvy.
They can't seriously think they are tricking us...
Hamsters...
Body Describer Table Chart - Gmac - 06-27-2013
Like most guys I'm sure, I prefer 2, 3, and 8's, but I don't mind a 0 or 4. Not a fan of muscular, but I wouldn't say no.
Body Describer Table Chart - vinman - 06-27-2013
Man, some of the comments from ugly broads just reinforce what I've always said. Sexism and objectification are things that only ugly broads care about.
Body Describer Table Chart - Nascimento - 06-27-2013
2,3,8 I'd approach during the day.
1,4 only at night.
I might be interested in a 5 at some point, just for some variety, especially if she has a cute face.
0,9 get me drunk and tell me I'll never have sex again unless I do her, and I'll give it a go.
6 lose 100 pounds then we'll talk.
7 how haven't you died from a heart attack yet?
Body Describer Table Chart - Gopher - 06-27-2013
4s are good to go if that extra weight goes to their ass rather than the gut.
Body Describer Table Chart - Kabal - 06-27-2013
Quote: (06-27-2013 08:13 PM)Gopher Wrote:
4s are good to go if that extra weight goes to their ass rather than the gut.
Yeah, but then they'd be 3s and not 4s.
Body Describer Table Chart - Gopher - 06-27-2013
^^ agreed
Body Describer Table Chart - iknowexactly - 06-27-2013
Quote: (06-27-2013 08:13 PM)Gopher Wrote:
4s are good to go if that extra weight goes to their ass rather than the gut.
Some women the SIZE of the 4 pictured aren't "flabby" but are just more muscular than average women, I like them.
Body Describer Table Chart - augen sehen - 06-28-2013
My "FAT" alarm goes off a lot sooner than 6, lol. I'd call 4 and 5 fat as well. 3 is curvy, but the problem is that bitches who resemble 5 think curvy applies to them.
Body Describer Table Chart - blackglasses - 06-28-2013
I prefer between 3 and 5
Body Describer Table Chart - LaCobra - 06-28-2013
When i was in high school everybody was skinny.
So: Number 0 anytime.
Body Describer Table Chart - RexImperator - 06-28-2013
2,3, or 4 although 2 is a little too skinny (ribs visible) and 4 a tad heavy. A girl needs some body fat for successful childbearing.
Body Describer Table Chart - Hotwheels - 06-28-2013
3 is my fav all day long and I wouldn't be ashamed in the least to be tapping 4.
Body Describer Table Chart - Divorco - 06-28-2013
Except for the Fat #6, they are all wearing bikinis. Most women past a certain age cannot even wear a two-piece bathing suit. Even the "chubby" model is merely thick, and the "flabby" one is distinctly above-average for her age. The others are mostly runway lingerie and swimsuit models, literally "10's" who earn hundreds of thousands of dollars to show their bodies.
Body Describer Table Chart - Teekay - 06-28-2013
2-4 for me is the ideal range with 0 and 1 being way too skinny. 8 maybe, 9, thanks I'm not into dudes. An occassional 5 when the lighting is favorable? Why the hell not! :]
Body Describer Table Chart - Timoteo - 06-28-2013
Number 4 can call herself "curvy" and not be lying. Number 5, if it's distributed right and doesn't have cellulite, can still get hit. Number 3 is my ideal, but 2, 8 and 9 can also get some.
Body Describer Table Chart - Mentavious - 06-28-2013
I can do 3 and 4 and easily be seen in public with them. I could bang 5 but wouldn't be caught with her as my gf
Body Describer Table Chart - Ensam - 06-28-2013
Am I the only one who prefers 5 to 4? In order I'd take 3, 2, 8, 5, 4, 1, 0. The others don't pass the boner test.
I'd rather have a girl be in shape or shapely but not in between. I think 6 and 7 might as well be in the same category - unbangable but there are a lot that of different shapes between 5 and 6.
Body Describer Table Chart - Slavophile - 06-28-2013
In order of preference: 3, 2, 5, 4, 8, 0, 1. No Fakkin way: 6, 7, 9
Body Describer Table Chart - xmlenigma - 06-28-2013
2.5
![[Image: smile.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I had no idea so many people would post on this. I was actually looking to find my TYPE and I'd say 2.5
Body Describer Table Chart - MikeCF - 06-28-2013
I'm a 2/3 man.
But I'm not gonna lie....
If my test levels were in a spike and I hadn't been watching porn and it was gonna be a total no-hassle, sure thing....Would bang a 4 or 5.
Body Describer Table Chart - Basil Ransom - 06-29-2013
Clearly a lame white guy made this - you can't see any ass in these photos.
Also, athletic comes in lots of different forms. Most athletic girls I meet are not as lean as the girl pictured; they'll have a little extra fat that enhances their feminine appeal, and often muscular legs with a phat ass. Yoga girls, for instance, are definitely not that lean or mannish looking.
'Muscular' girls like that are extremely rare, unless you're hanging around female bodybuilders or something.
![[Image: athletes.jpg]](https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-jgPbmZvKhYc/UBqOXrrvQPI/AAAAAAAAAgE/44YUv_ES3oQ/s1600/athletes.jpg)
![[Image: athletes04.jpg]](http://ninamatsumoto.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/athletes04.jpg)
![[Image: athletes10-med.jpg]](http://www.stumptuous.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/athletes10-med.jpg)
My favorite kind of athlete:
Body Describer Table Chart - JayJuanGee - 08-31-2013
Quote: (06-27-2013 07:14 PM)xmlenigma Wrote:
Not sure if you guys had seen this.
http://www.taglol.com/meme/girls-body-sizes/9363/
Since this posting was referred to in another thread, I cannot help but to comment that I find all of these body types are potentially bangable, except for 6 & 7, and part of the bangability of each of them would depend on the face. Certainly 3 is preferred; however, part of the bangability of each of these is that they generally are in o.k. shape and look o.k. in a two piece bathing suit.
On the other hand, this table seems to be very incomplete and to leave out a large number of female body types that i frequently seem to be witnessing in the USA, and it especially seems that there are a lot of types in the USA that would fit in some arena between 5 & 6, or types of women that have no tits or have saggy tits, have belly fat or tit fat, even happening while a girl is still in her 20s - an American woman phenomenon?
Body Describer Table Chart - artur jedi - 08-31-2013
2/3 is preferred. But would bang also 1,5&8 if its an easy shot and I'm thirsty.