[The Beast1]

I'm of the belief that the government shouldn't define what a marriage is. That is the purveyor of churches, synagogues, Allah House, etc. Separation of church, state, and all.

Simply go into the law books, do a "Find and Replace", and switch marriage to something called a "union for two people". If this was done we can put this annoying wedge issue to rest and move on as a country. I tacitly accept the right of two consenting adults to do whatever they want behind closed doors. However the behavior shouldn't be considered cool nor "hip".

The issue that really needs to be talked about are how gay males are a massive vector for all types of diseases. Part of the perk gay males enjoy is easy access to a sexual release and that is precisely why gay males have the highest incidences of all sorts of nasty bugs.

[rpg]

From where I am I dont see gays getting married anymore. It was a fad.
I think it is for old lesbians trying to not die alone.

[eskimobobseal]

Separation of church and state has nothing to do with defining marriage as one man and one woman. Yes, people can do whatever they like behind closed doors but that doesn't mean it needs to be sanctioned by the state. You shouldn't be afforded benefits for marrying a horse just as sure as you shouldn't for marrying someone of the same sex, the government may have separated itself from the doctrines of religious institutions but it never separated itself from the laws of nature.

[Sidney Crosby]

I don't care if fags get married or not, but just let them get married so everyone can stop wasting valuable time talking about it.

There are so many issues way more important than gay marriage, it's a losing battle fighting it.... anyone who can't see that is delusional, every single year it gets more and more accepted/normalized.

[Leonard D Neubache]

(04-10-2016 01:20 AM)EDantes Wrote:  

It's already been legalized by the Supreme Court.

So what purpose would this serve at all other than satisfying the social justice crowd just for the pure hell of it?

This is one of the basic trends I notice with SJW activists; they're primarily just motivated by "feelings" and enjoy pushing for things which accomplish nothing but make them "feel" like they're helping. The zillions of meaningless "Change.org" petitions being one example.

Some of them, perhaps.

Many others are zealots who would push laws demanding we feed baby seals into woodchippers if it meant getting a stab at their enemies, namely us.

For the elites and their more rabid progressive henchmen this has nothing to do with fighting for justice. It's about dismantling people like us, one issue at a time.

And anyone who thinks this isn't a big deal can drop a line to the people who have had their family businesses destroyed by the Gaystapo.

I didn't used to give a shit about the issue. Live and let live, etc.

Now I recognise that the gay lobby, like the feminist lobby, like the islam lobby, like the refugee lobby, are not working to kill us but instead to erase the very mental components that we were ever comprised of.

So people mighty say "gay marriage? What's the big deal?"

The big deal is that it's just another step in a never ending process of eliminating you, me and everyone like us.

I will resist it, like I would resist a bayonet being pressed "just one more measly millimetre" into my chest.

[Gimlet]

Indeed, the purpose of marriage is to sire legitimate heirs in order to pass along property. The real reason why gay marriage was promoted so heavily despite affecting 2% of the population (or really less since the lesbians are the only ones who truly want to marry) is to chip away at property ownership. We see poly Bullshit everywhere now because that is the next step in the destruction of marriage for the promotion of socialism : in a 4 way marriage, it is impossible to designate a legitimate heir. More property willl be absorbed by The State, which is the point.

"it doesn't affect me"is the short sighted opinion you are supposed to have.

[Different T]

Quote:

Indeed, the purpose of marriage is to sire legitimate heirs in order to pass along property.

That's one reason. It's also to raise heirs capable of productively managing the property they inherit/acquire. If a Capital (in the Marxian sense) loses its ability to manage its domain, how much longer will it remain independent?

You can also view the "you were lucky to be born a white male in America" from this perspective. The purpose is to redefine our inheritance as something up for grabs by any other being who wants to place a claim on it.

Quote:

Bullshit everywhere now because that is the next step in the destruction of marriage for the promotion of socialism : in a 4 way marriage, it is impossible to designate a legitimate heir. More property willl be absorbed by The State, which is the point.

Nor is it really possible to place the obligation of child care in a such an arrangement. Gee, I wonder what institutions would absorb that function/responsibility? Nor is it even clear why such an arrangement would consider reproduction as a goal. You can look up Lebensborn, Chinese synthetic sperm, artificial uteri, IP law regarding genetic modification/engineering, etc.

[Easy_C]

Not just that. Keep in mind the agenda we've discussed in the Hollywood thread. There was some information in there which corroborates my own research as to exactly WHY the powers that be are so aggressively pushing homosexuality and transgenderism. This rabbit hole goes very deep.