Gari's/"Susan's" account lacks the ring of truth on several fronts.
First, as was pointed out EvanWilson, it's odd that a woman in Iceland would contact this particular blogger/author to tell her story.
Quote:Quote:
One of Roosh’s victims read my blog back in November and reached out to me, asking for my help in exposing him. She finally agreed to be interviewed after seeing how he continues to spout his poisonous, misogynist rhetoric with sickening bravado.
Susan "finally" agreed to talk to Gari about the allegations — yet it was Susan who supposedly contacted Gari in November, for the express purpose of "exposing" Roosh.
(It would make more sense if Gari said she was initially skeptical of Susan's story, but after months of communication, she has decided that Susan is sincere & is telling the truth.)
Gari claims she "interviewed" Susan. Yet if this is true, she has chosen a strange way of presenting Susan's tale: not in Susan's voice, but in third person, in effect as a reporter relaying a factual story.
Quote:Quote:
He laughed and overpowered her with force, saying, “All girls like this. It’s every woman’s fantasy. You don’t even know what you’re saying. You’re drunk, but I like drunk girls.”
"He laughed and overpowered her with force" deserves to be in the Purple Prose Hall of Fame.
"Laughed" is a specific action — "overpowered her with force" is totally vague. What
specifically did he do?
How did he overpower her? What kind of "force" was used?
Quote:Quote:
And then, according to Susan, he raped her.
The crux of the matter, the core accusation, the claim that could easily ruin a man's life and reputation forever, stated in just three small words: "
he raped her." No details, no description, no specifics. (As Nineteen84's helpful text comparison link below shows, the sentence initially did not even include "according to Susan.")
We get to hear all about the events leading up to the rape — yet the crime itself is stated in exactly ten letters.
How did Roosh "rape" her? What did he do? How long did the "rape" go on? What took place immediately afterward?
Gari's account jumps to an undetermined later point in time when Susan discovered Roosh's books — a discovery which, according to Gari, "mortified" Susan. One imagines that a rape victim would be much more "mortified" by the fact that she has been raped, than by learning of her alleged rapist's literary output.
Susan, naturally, did not report the rape to the authorities. "He’s an American and she lives in Iceland," Gari explains. "She feels she has no recourse."
Susan might feel that way now, but did Roosh magically vanish from Iceland moments after raping her? It's preposterous that a woman would fail to report a rape to the police on the grounds that the rapist is a foreign tourist.
It all reads like bad, poorly thought-out fiction. I wish Roosh & his legal team victory.