0 Vaccine Dodgers Catch Chicken Pox
12-11-2015, 02:00 AM
Where's Zelcorpion? Should we get vaccinated or wot m8?
Quote: (12-11-2015 01:52 AM)Byzantium Wrote:
Quote: (12-11-2015 01:43 AM)Mr. Brightside Wrote:
My great grandmother got shingles in her eye socket and they had to sew that sucker shut. Thank god for vaccines, and god bless those little kiddos whose parents are too fucking ignorant to give their children such protection.
The protection of a god whose existence isn't worth capitalizing isn't worth invoking or thanking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YVPkCQxqz4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxH7MoHjafM
Here's one for you in particular.
Vaccination Caused Asthma, Anaphylactic Shock and Shingles In Eye:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wlqCk4mR58
Quote: (12-11-2015 02:27 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:
I can post youtube videos of Architects saying they think the World Trade Center had to be controlled demolition. So what? Anyone can make a youtube video of useless garbage
Youtube videos aren't evidence.
Especially ones featuring a mom drawing her own uninformed conclusions, and put out by a website called "StopMandatoryVaccination . com"
I'll go with evidence based on science, research, logic, real world results. Thanks.
Quote: (12-11-2015 03:04 AM)Byzantium Wrote:
You go with the "official" version of 9/11 and vaccines. I go with real evidence based on science, research, logic, and real world results (such as planes hitting skyscrapers before and never causing a building to collapse in a free fall).
Quote: (12-11-2015 03:04 AM)Byzantium Wrote:
Quote: (12-11-2015 02:27 AM)GlobalMan Wrote:
I can post youtube videos of Architects saying they think the World Trade Center had to be controlled demolition. So what? Anyone can make a youtube video of useless garbage
Youtube videos aren't evidence.
Especially ones featuring a mom drawing her own uninformed conclusions, and put out by a website called "StopMandatoryVaccination . com"
I'll go with evidence based on science, research, logic, real world results. Thanks.
Speaking of the WTC.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFkuG54q6lo
You go with the "official" version of 9/11 and vaccines. I go with real evidence based on science, research, logic, and real world results (such as planes hitting skyscrapers before and never causing a building to collapse in a free fall).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CodLDGhTe0k
Quote: (12-11-2015 03:39 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:
Quote: (12-11-2015 03:04 AM)Byzantium Wrote:
You go with the "official" version of 9/11 and vaccines. I go with real evidence based on science, research, logic, and real world results (such as planes hitting skyscrapers before and never causing a building to collapse in a free fall).
Well, here's a logical proposition for you: rarity of result does not preclude a possibility from becoming an actuality.
It's rare for planes to actually hit skyscrapers at all, which makes the survey sample a bit small. And it's rare for fully loaded 747s to hit buildings, too, which makes the survey sample even smaller.
The Empire State Building was struck by a B-25 bomber in 1945 -- which is probably the example you're driving at -- but it massed a maximum of 41,000 pounds, and contained a maximum fuel load of 947 gallons. The bomber was trying to avoid the building, and its maximum speed was 275 mph. As a result, structural damage took place, which was repairable, and the building is still standing today.
The planes used on 9/11 each contained 10,000 gallons of fuel. Each plane massed a gross of about 274,000 pounds. They were travelling at between 470 mph and 590 mph, again significant since kinetic energy transferred in a collision is much greater with higher speed, let alone how hot the fuel fires burned. Seven times the mass and twice the speed (or more - 275 mph is the maximum speed, which the B-25 was probably not doing). Therefore: much greater structural damage, leading to a collapse of the WTC towers.
Quote: (12-11-2015 01:52 AM)Byzantium Wrote:
Quote: (12-11-2015 01:43 AM)Mr. Brightside Wrote:
My great grandmother got shingles in her eye socket and they had to sew that sucker shut. Thank god for vaccines, and god bless those little kiddos whose parents are too fucking ignorant to give their children such protection.
The protection of a god whose existence isn't worth capitalizing isn't worth invoking or thanking.
Quote: (12-11-2015 04:59 PM)Requiem Wrote:
Maybe the 2 main towers fell because of the weight of the planes but I'm still sceptical as this doesn't explain why the steel beams just melted away like my heart when I see Selena Gomez (a little cheesy joke here for the very funny amongst us).
Quote: (12-12-2015 10:52 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:
Vaccines are not some uniform type, I am convinced most vaccines are very good, such as polio, TB and a bunch of other things. The long standing vaccines have been tested on millions if not billions of people. Cause and effect and side effects are well known.
What is not good is hastily put together vaccines when the latest flu scare out of Africa or the HPV vaccine or vaccines for non-lethal, non-risky diseases, pushed by the corrupt medical establishment.
Quote: (12-12-2015 07:15 PM)achromaticmike Wrote:
Quote: (12-11-2015 04:59 PM)Requiem Wrote:
Maybe the 2 main towers fell because of the weight of the planes but I'm still sceptical as this doesn't explain why the steel beams just melted away like my heart when I see Selena Gomez (a little cheesy joke here for the very funny amongst us).
You do know that steel doesn't need to melt before it loses substantial strength right?
http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/
Quote: (12-13-2015 11:17 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:
to quote posters before me, cite Youtube as "truth"
Quote: (12-13-2015 11:17 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:
It was a matter of heat+steel+impact+oxygen+fuel+gravity. I have no idea how heavy the towers weighed but the parts above the impact areas were heavy enough to cause a cataclysmic implosion and when weight is combined with intertia, you have only a skeleton of a building left to take the impact, the end result is a pile on the ground.