rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Meet the New Serfs: You
#1

Meet the New Serfs: You

I do think that the majority of police are good people tasked with a thankless, dangerous job. That being said, the power police wield is scary to behold when it ends up being wrongly applied to innocent citizens...

Meet the New Serfs: You
By Kevin D. Williamson

Quote:Quote:

The New Haven SWAT team must have been pretty amped up: It was midnight, and they were getting ready to bust down the door of a man wanted on charges involving weapons violations, robbery — and murder. They were not sure how many people were in the house, or how they’d react. After a volley of flash grenades that set fire to the carpet and a sofa, they moved in, guns drawn. A minute later, they had their man zip-tied on the floor.

If only they’d double-checked the address first.


Bobby Griffin Jr. was wanted on murder charges. His next-door neighbor on Peck Street, Joseph Adams, wasn’t. But that didn’t stop the SWAT team from knocking down his door, setting his home on fire, roughing him up, keeping him tied up in his underwear for nearly three hours, and treating the New Haven man, who is gay, to a nance show as officers taunted him with flamboyantly effeminate mannerisms. If the events detailed in Mr. Adams’s recently filed lawsuit are even remotely accurate, the episode was a moral violation and, arguably, a crime.

And when Mr. Adams showed up at the New Haven police department the next day to fill out paperwork requesting that the authorities reimburse him for the wanton destruction of his property — never mind the gross violation of his rights — the story turned Kafkaesque, as interactions with American government agencies at all levels tend to do. The police — who that same night had managed to take in the murder suspect next door without the use of flash grenades or other theatrics after his mother suggested that they were probably there for her son — denied having any record of the incident at Mr. Adams’s home ever having happened.

This sort of thing happens with disturbing regularity. The New York Police Department killed an older woman in Harlem when they mistakenly raided her home in 2003. In that case, too, “flash-bang” grenades were deployed, and the concussions sent 57-year-old Alberta Spruiell into cardiac arrest, killing her. The NYPD was acting on information given to them by a local lowlife drug dealer they were leaning on. It was the first information he’d given them as an informant, and based on nothing more than that they went in hard — no-knock raid, grenades, the whole circus. As it turns out, New York dope-slingers turned rat are not entirely trustworthy.

In Miami’s Coconut Grove, police struck a child in the head with their rifle butts after a no-knock SWAT raid. The address of the home was not the address on the warrant — that was two blocks away – but police insist they were in the right, warrant be damned. “They broke every single flat-screen TV, they broke the PlayStation 4, they broke every single picture frame, for whatever reason. Every single thing they could possibly break, they broke,” the homeowner said. The police insisted that they had meant to hit that house, in which there was no one other than the children, and that they had seized “narcotics” — a trivial amount of marijuana — and “weapons” — a handgun, which is perfectly legal to own in Florida.

The stories get grisly: In Habersham County, Ga., police looking for a drug dealer — at a home in which he did not reside — broke down the doors thinking they’d find drugs and guns, which of course they didn’t. But they did manage to toss a flash grenade into a baby’s playpen, burning part of the child’s face off. The family was left with nearly $1 million in medical bills, and the kid will need surgery every few years until he stops growing. The police insist they did nothing wrong. And as in New Haven, when they found the drug dealer for whom they were searching, the Georgia authorities brought him in without incident, without kicking down any doors or throwing any stun grenades.

The disfigurement of a child is horrific to contemplate. (“If you’ve never wept and want to, have a child,” David Foster Wallace wrote in “Incarnations of Burned Children.”) But the image that really hooks me is that of Joseph Adams schlepping up to the New Haven police department to endure some bureaucracy and to fill out some paperwork — because no matter how badly government screws up, fixing what’s gone wrong is always your problem. I can picture his situation precisely — every police department, driver’s-license office, tax bureau, and city licensing agency exhibits the same distinctive blind of slowly simmering hostility, smugness, contempt, and complete immunity from accountability. We are ruled by criminals, and their alibi is: “There’s no record of that in the system.” That, or: “The computer won’t let me do that.”


In a sane world, the New Haven authorities would have shown up at Adams’s house with a check, flowers, and an apology, and a certificate exempting him from taxes for the rest of his life. In this world, people in his situation get treated by the government like they are the ones who have screwed up. And of course they’d say they had no record of the episode — getting information about your situation from any government agency, especially from one that is persecuting you, requires an agonizing effort. Keeping people in the dark is part of how they maintain their power. For fun sometime, call the comical New York State tax department and note the intentionally garbled phone numbers on the recording about how to get in touch with a tax agent’s superior to complain or ask a question.

The strange flip-side — the second half of Samuel Francis’s “anarcho-tyranny” — is that the brunt of government abuse falls on the law-abiding. Illinois, for example, makes it difficult for an ordinary citizen to legally carry a gun for self defense — up until a couple of years ago, doing so was categorically prohibited. But Illinois police seize thousands of illegal guns from criminals each year, and the state prosecutes practically none of those weapons cases. The law-abiding — by definition law-abiding — citizens applying for concealed-carry permits get treated like criminals, and the actual criminals do not. If you follow the law and inform Illinois authorities that you have a gun in the home, you invite all sorts of intrusion and oversight. If you don’t, nobody’s really looking. Meanwhile, the streets of Chicago are full of blood, going on 1,600 shootings this year and it’s not even Halloween. Nobody is held responsible for that carnage, but if you put an eleventh round in your legally owned rifle in Oak Park, you’re looking at jail time.

It’s perverse: If an ordinary citizen makes a typo on his 1040EZ, he could be on the hook for untold sums of money, fines, even jail time. When the IRS abuses its power to harass political enemies, nothing happens. A few years ago, an employer of mine entered the wrong Social Security number on my paperwork — I have barbaric handwriting — and the error took months of telephone calls and mail to fix, a period of time over which I was threatened with all sorts of nasty consequences by the Social Security Administration and the IRS. But when the Social Security Administration oversees the payment of millions of dollars in benefits to Nazi war criminals summering on Croatian beaches, nothing happens. If you’re an ordinary schmo, a typo can land you in jail. If you work for the government, you can burn the face off a baby and walk.

Even in medieval times, the distinction between lords and serfs was not so pronounced.
Reply
#2

Meet the New Serfs: You

B-b-but the government is here to help!

If you've got nothing to hide you've got nothing to fear!

And they really should do something about those nasty guns in civilian hands!

You are one unlucky roll of the dice away from being brutalized by the police and the "good" cops will stand by and idly watch. Even if they're not on board with what's going on they won't help because it'll get them ostracized and make them targets. And who are you to them, anyway? They don't know you.

http://web.mit.edu/dryfoo/Info/fuhrman.html

Quote:Quote:

(...describing police officer partner tearing up driver's licenses.)

"He's constantly tearing up driver's licenses.

Q: You do that, he probably got that from you.'

A: No, he has his own style, he goes, `Give me your driver's license. (Motions - Rips it up.) `You're a fucking jerk, you get out of here. Next time you're driving without a license, it's my car.'

Q: If officers tear up your driver's license, what can that person do?

A: Staffling.

Q: Staffling?

A: You stole something, although it's not that person's property. It's property of motor vehicles.

Q: you can just deny it, can't you?

A: So long as you don't have any witnesses . . . Then you've got other officers that are kind of part of the group. They only want to go so far, and they are -- not chicken up to the supervisors but -- no problem, real helpful types that make you sick to your stomach almost, but they're still decent guys and you can count on them.

Q: Real helpful.

A: Q: Real helpful.

A: They want to be part of the group, but they're climbing, they want to go somewhere. And most of us are going no where. And most of us are going nowhere."

"Men willingly believe what they wish." - Julius Caesar, De Bello Gallico, Book III, Ch. 18
Reply
#3

Meet the New Serfs: You

unfortunately (very unfortunately) the culture war has been lost. the statists have won.

they tend to cloak themselves in "benevolent leftism" or "progressivism", but really the new religion is that the state is master and the citizens servants. all other considerations are secondary.
Reply
#4

Meet the New Serfs: You

You know things are getting bad when the National Review is running stories on police brutality. Mainstream conservatives have always been first to come to the defense of the police - "hey, if black people are hating on them, they must be doing something right!"
Reply
#5

Meet the New Serfs: You

To the Plutocracy and the ruling Elite we are all Serfs - including guys who have amassed 100 mio. $.

The term SERF is used by some wealthy families to all who believe in the mainstream propaganda and are just willing actors in their play.
They actually despise those who let themselves be brainwashed easily even more than the poor.
Reply
#6

Meet the New Serfs: You

Great, relevant article:

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2...12160.html

Tl;dr cops have no one to police them, so they are unaccountable; the NYPD hates honest men who fight back against corruption.
Reply
#7

Meet the New Serfs: You

Quote: (10-24-2014 12:33 PM)Basil Ransom Wrote:  

You know things are getting bad when the National Review is running stories on police brutality. Mainstream conservatives have always been first to come to the defense of the police - "hey, if black people are hating on them, they must be doing something right!"

I wonder if they'll ever put 2 and 2 together.
Their cheerleading pretty much lead to the current state of affairs.

Doubt it.

WIA
Reply
#8

Meet the New Serfs: You

Quote: (10-24-2014 04:18 PM)Basil Ransom Wrote:  

Great, relevant article:

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2...12160.html

Tl;dr cops have no one to police them, so they are unaccountable; the NYPD hates honest men who fight back against corruption.

That's probably the best thing I've ever read on Politico.
Reply
#9

Meet the New Serfs: You

Good article then he blew it in the last paragraph by bringing up the "OMG Nazis are collecting Social Security" story.

The reason why a few ex-camp guards are collecting Social Security is that they worked in the USA for many years and the law does not allow denial of benefits.

Of course they are writing a law to deny Social Security benefits now. How much you want to bet they will mandate denial not just to ex Nazi guards, but to a lot of other people like ex convicts?
Reply
#10

Meet the New Serfs: You

My mom had this happen to her a few years ago.

She happened to look out the window and saw an entire SWAT team had surrounded her house.

Fortunately it was not a no-knock raid and she explained that she had been living there for a couple years and had no idea who the person they were looking for was.

And this was a quiet suburban neighborhood, with a sheriff living directly across the street and another cop a few houses down.
Reply
#11

Meet the New Serfs: You

Americans talk about land of the free. You don't see these death squads, sorry SWAT teams in any other developed countries, nor most developing countries.

I used to watch these programs late at night. SWAT teams with 100+ guys armed to the teeth like soldiers bearing down on some low ranked druggie. Funny how they don't film the episodes where they gatecrash some innocent person and treat them like shit.

Is it any wonder why there is little to no respect for police officers. This doesn't bode well for the future. A police state only gets so far before it creates violent convulsions from the public.
Reply
#12

Meet the New Serfs: You

Quote: (10-25-2014 06:55 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

Americans talk about land of the free. You don't see these death squads, sorry SWAT teams in any other developed countries, nor most developing countries.

I used to watch these programs late at night. SWAT teams with 100+ guys armed to the teeth like soldiers bearing down on some low ranked druggie. Funny how they don't film the episodes where they gatecrash some innocent person and treat them like shit.

Is it any wonder why there is little to no respect for police officers. This doesn't bode well for the future. A police state only gets so far before it creates violent convulsions from the public.

The death squads are coming for everybody - give them time and they will be everywhere. I see them in EE now kicking in doors and cracking skulls of innocent people as they pursue high level criminals like pot dealers or car thieves - it gets in the news as they once again have the wrong address or "bad intel".

Does anyone remember the CASTLE DOCTRINE? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_doctrine
What the media now often spins just the same as on Wikipedia is that it gives a person to defend his home/his castle even via deadly force. But that was not the main tenet - the anti-gun lobby spins it that way.

The main point was that a home is to be supposed to be a man's (or a woman's) castle and NO ONE can enter unannounced LEGALLY! Not if you get an anonymous "tip", a shot was maybe heard, someone heard something somewhere, or you have some fleeting suspicion - those were the reasons why the castle doctrine was created. It does not matter, whether some bad guys got away or not because of it - the 99 affected innocents or small-time-offenders were to be left in peace at least relatively speaking. You can always get a warrant and search the house.

Nowadays people don't even dare speaking against sending a SWAT team against a suspected pot dealer. It all started after with the fake war against drugs (while the government has been caught dealing big time and laundering money so often that anyone with a pea-brain should know that governments are the biggest top-down dealers out there). Now they added terrorism as another fake reason - I guess Ebola is also a reason recently.

But in the end you have a standing army that can use mortars and combat tanks on you for any trumped up reason!

[Image: attachment.jpg22328]   
Reply
#13

Meet the New Serfs: You

The level of pork going to state, local and federal law enforcement is obvious, but other areas were a bit surprising. Hell, even the Department of Education and the Railroad Retirement Board have a SWAT teams.

I've got friends who are cops, a few of who unfortunately parrot the usual lines "we risk our lives"; "you don't know who has a weapon" etc. Ok, I get it - the job is dangerous, and perhaps even less predictable than before. And yes, the worst threats are rotated in and out of jails in the US, but they still need to do better than this. Cops get away with deadly force shootings situations where a civilian claiming the same threat would have been locked away for life.

The mindset is more of an occupying army eager to go full Rambo over a traffic stop than a community based police force.
Reply
#14

Meet the New Serfs: You

I thought this was going to be a thread about civil forfeiture - which is how local police departments are funding their SWAT teams.



Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)