[Dueyz]

For those who already have, disregard. For the rest...

We all use a different scale to measure the attractiveness of a woman. For the sake of this test, use a .5 scale. Use solid and half numbers like 5.5, 6, 7, 7.5, etc. Measure only based on overall physical attractiveness and disclude personality.

Tally up the number of women you've slept with. Assign each a number (rating) based on attractiveness. Add up all the ratings. Now divide that number by the total number of broads you've banged (aka average), and look at the average rating of the girls you've slept with.

I did this and was AMAZED at the average hotness rating of the girls I've banged. Puts shit into perspective real quick.

[Dueyz]

***For those of you who think a '5' is ugly, rather than average, your number is gonna look much better. MY scale measures an average broad (not overly ugly or overly cute) at 5. Mediocre and middle of the road. If I used a typical Westernized man's scale, I'd say a 5 was ugly, and every cute girl was a 7. I don't hand out 7's or 8's nearly as quickly, so my number will be lower than all of you who think a cute girl is a 7.

[oldnemesis]

(03-29-2011 01:48 AM)Dueyz Wrote:  

Tally up the number of women you've slept with. Assign each a number (rating) based on attractiveness.

If you can remember more than half of women you slept with at all, you have something else to work besides calculating numbers.

[D. Goodnuts]

(03-29-2011 02:15 AM)oldnemesis Wrote:  

(03-29-2011 01:48 AM)Dueyz Wrote:  

Tally up the number of women you've slept with. Assign each a number (rating) based on attractiveness.

If you can remember more than half of women you slept with at all, you have something else to work besides calculating numbers.

So true! I remember the location of the bang, i.e. dorm room, beach, park bench etc. I almost never remember names and faces are veeerry blurry