[The Lizard of Oz]

(05-19-2014 09:18 PM)Agastya Wrote:  

(05-19-2014 08:51 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

(05-19-2014 07:31 PM)Agastya Wrote:  

I can only imagine the kind of confusion and uncertainty that would beset a trans kid, or the ridiculous amount of violent bullying that a gay child in the Deep South would experience.

It's only in their wildest dreams and fantasies that they are getting "violently bullied" in their own "Deep South".

There is absolutely no reason to believe that "gay children" anywhere in the US, including the deepest South, are subject to some sort of unthinkable "violent bullying". Maybe they get teased a little by some straight bucks which only makes them all the more hot and bothered.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/new...z1lMUOhTkF

Yeah, okay. Read that article from top to bottom.

I'm not one for letting little kids get treated like absolute shit for something they can't really control, least of all by adults who should know better.

Not even Canadians would consider Minnesota to be the "Deep South".

Sure these gayboyz and youngdykez get teased some. Is that "violent bullying"? How so?

And if you think that words are what is making these kids kill themselves -- read up on antidepressant polypharmacy and suicides. They are prescribed multi-drug cocktails up to their gills by irresponsible docs to deal with their "confusions" and "depression". And that really does spell the end for many.

[kbell]

So what would be the most offensive book to read to her while banging her?

[Dusty]

She's cute now but won't age well. Already has wrinkles around her eyes. Her shitty attitude will hasten the walls arrival.

[caracal]

(05-19-2014 09:31 PM)kbell Wrote:  

So what would be the most offensive book to read to her while banging her?

Not a book, but a magazine - Hustler.

But I wouldn't be reading it to her, I'd be showing her the pictures as I banged her. "Look at those victims of the patriarchy, I bet they're taking cock in Las Vegas and spending their money on LV handbags right now!"

[xpatplayer]

I sincerely hope that the US Government becomes super-authoritarian and gives in completely into the feminine imperative. I then hope that cunts like her get screwed over because of some obscure progressive law. They deserve the world they are creating. Me? I'm just going to do my own shit, make bank and find a way to be above getting arrested. And laugh at every cunt getting thrown in jail over some hysteria she created earlier.

To any optimists out there - remember that these kids will be the future leaders of America. That should give you perspective on our brave new future.

[Switch]

Graphic images are a part of life. When I was little I saw an old man beat a duck to death with a 3-wood. I still remember the bloody quacks and screaming and the man throwing it into the pond when he was done. Was it traumatic for my 6 year old self? Yes. Did it help me grow and develop as a person? Yes. If that old man turned to me beforehand and said "I'm about to beat this dying duck to death with my 3-wood, don't watch." I would have looked away. Graphic and bad shit helps you grow up. If you can't deal with the realities of the world and you need warnings for everything, you're going to be in for a long, shitty life. People need to learn to deal with their own problems.

[Truth Teller]

These are the same college students who have no trouble watching stuff like the Saw series and Saving Private Ryan. Honestly, if they have problems with some books, they can talk to professors. No reason to put up a ton of stuff about "trigger warnings."

[Agastya]

(05-19-2014 09:28 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

(05-19-2014 09:18 PM)Agastya Wrote:  

(05-19-2014 08:51 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

(05-19-2014 07:31 PM)Agastya Wrote:  

I can only imagine the kind of confusion and uncertainty that would beset a trans kid, or the ridiculous amount of violent bullying that a gay child in the Deep South would experience.

It's only in their wildest dreams and fantasies that they are getting "violently bullied" in their own "Deep South".

There is absolutely no reason to believe that "gay children" anywhere in the US, including the deepest South, are subject to some sort of unthinkable "violent bullying". Maybe they get teased a little by some straight bucks which only makes them all the more hot and bothered.

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/new...z1lMUOhTkF

Yeah, okay. Read that article from top to bottom.

I'm not one for letting little kids get treated like absolute shit for something they can't really control, least of all by adults who should know better.

Not even Canadians would consider Minnesota to be the "Deep South".

Sure these gayboyz and youngdykez get teased some. Is that "violent bullying"? How so?

And if you think that words are what is making these kids kill themselves -- read up on antidepressant polypharmacy and suicides. They are prescribed multi-drug cocktails up to their gills by irresponsible docs to deal with their "confusions" and "depression". And that really does spell the end for many.

I don't know, man, the thought of little kids being subject to an environment of constant hatred--not just from kids, but from adults, too--is something that bothers me. Things like that shouldn't just be trivialized as "getting teased some"; this a concerted community effort to marginalize and hurt these kids. For a lot of them, butch/effeminate tendencies aren't really things they can control. In my opinion, they should just be left alone and treated like normal people.

I fucked with people and got fucked with myself as a kid, but juvenile bullying is a wholly different animal from outright hatred from almost every aspect of society. Places like the Minnesota town described in the article could use a shot of liberalism.

[The Lizard of Oz]

I agree that these kids can't help being what they are and should be treated decently.

But I see no evidence even in this obvious Rolling Stone mag propaganda piece of anything remotely approaching "outright hatred from almost every aspect of society".

There are clearly some Evangelical activist types going a little crazy, to some extent as an understandable backlash against the extreme catering to gays in the media and elsewhere. But "violent bullying" etc? Nah, not more than you'd expect in the normal course of things.

[Screwston]

Agastya sounds like a fag/tranny supporter.

[Agastya]

(05-20-2014 12:00 AM)Screwston Wrote:  

Agastya sounds like a fag/tranny supporter.

Eh, I just don't like the thought of kids getting harshly bullied for things they can't really control. And I have no personal ill will towards gays or transgendered people...they haven't inconvenienced me in any way, and as long as they do their own thing I see no reason to feel otherwise.

[darklightdispatch]

These hysterical feminists are right. Women *are* like children. They shouldn't be exposed to the harshness of the world. Men, on the other hand, need to look at reality as honestly and realistically as possible in order to serve their function. One educational system can't serve the needs of both genders.

The whole "educate women like men" thing was a mistake from the start. That's the real problem here.

[KorbenDallas]

Gays tend to be the largest percentage of pedophiles. I used to think like Agastya, but after seeing the video recently of teachers pushing homosexuality on 5 year olds, the pictures of the catamite training camp that Samseau posted and the news coming out of the reign of terror that goes on in Hollywood regarding the gay directors that abuse you children ages 11-16, I don't think like him anymore.

Agastya is in college and it's "cool" to be pro-gay in the US now, so, I'm not saying Agastya'e hearts in the wrong place, but your wrong about what's going on in the US. Gay's are celebrated in the US, not bullied. I've never seen a gay treated anything but better than normal and I grew up in the midwest. Furthermore, Bill Price author of the "Spearhead" wrote an article that talked about how jobless young men were being sexually abused in Seattle by its gay community. Obviously this gets no press. I am sure some gay men just want to be left alone, but there is a large percentage of them that are predators and pedophiles.

This is an opinion I've only come around to in the last 5 months, however, I am more confident in my views on gays now than I was before when i went along with the live and let live speal. Quite frankly I don't care what gays do as long as their consenting adults. I have a problem with the gay card being used to mask the predatory nature of these men, who, prey not on equals, but young children.

By the way, I was hit on as a young child by gay men in multiple occasions where if I didn't freak out they would have took advantage of me, so, don't give me the whole, "Gay's aren't really child molesters, but but that's ridiculous!"

[funkyzeit]

(05-19-2014 05:09 PM)Solus Wrote:  

Also, Ms. Loverin. WYB?

She has these "slut eyes", she just begs to have her pussy destroyed.

[kosko]

She likes getting gagged with the meat, and likes it rough. You can see it damn clearly in her eyes.

WB

[ElBorrachoInfamoso]

Anyone who needs a trigger warning doesn't deserve the right to vote and shouldn't be in higher education. Children need trigger warnings.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

This article -- and all the others about this topic -- should be titled: Female College students request "trigger warnings" for classic literature.

Whenever the balance of any group tips towards women, the culture changes. This is what we're seeing here.

Colleges are getting like elementary schools in that they're being run by and for women. Little by little, women are redesigning the institution to suit there whims and emotional needs.

What annoys me about these articles is the way they're framed The media is quick to blame men when women don't get raises or whatever. But they don't frame it as a women issue when women are doing something egregious.

You don't see the fabled "dudebro/fratboy/douchecanoe" calling for censorship. This coming from feminists or the "Christian" women who are feminist but don't realize they are (you know the type). The article should mention the lacrosse team managed to get through "Huck Finn" just fine, like men have done for 100 years.

[Feisbook Control]

(05-20-2014 01:41 AM)KorbenDallas Wrote:  

Gays tend to be the largest percentage of pedophiles. I used to think like Agastya, but after seeing the video recently of teachers pushing homosexuality on 5 year olds, the pictures of the catamite training camp that Samseau posted and the news coming out of the reign of terror that goes on in Hollywood regarding the gay directors that abuse you children ages 11-16, I don't think like him anymore.

Agastya is in college and it's "cool" to be pro-gay in the US now, so, I'm not saying Agastya'e hearts in the wrong place, but your wrong about what's going on in the US. Gay's are celebrated in the US, not bullied. I've never seen a gay treated anything but better than normal and I grew up in the midwest. Furthermore, Bill Price author of the "Spearhead" wrote an article that talked about how jobless young men were being sexually abused in Seattle by its gay community. Obviously this gets no press. I am sure some gay men just want to be left alone, but there is a large percentage of them that are predators and pedophiles.

This is an opinion I've only come around to in the last 5 months, however, I am more confident in my views on gays now than I was before when i went along with the live and let live speal. Quite frankly I don't care what gays do as long as their consenting adults. I have a problem with the gay card being used to mask the predatory nature of these men, who, prey not on equals, but young children.

By the way, I was hit on as a young child by gay men in multiple occasions where if I didn't freak out they would have took advantage of me, so, don't give me the whole, "Gay's aren't really child molesters, but but that's ridiculous!"

Interesting. Links?

[runsonmagic]

[awful sexual comment]

[Parlay44]

So violent video games are ok but violent books are bad

[KorbenDallas]

I don't feel like finding all the articles, but I assure you, what I wrote is accurate with only one exaggeration. The catamite training camp is not officially what it is, but it sure looks what it is. It's one of Samseau's recent threads.

[kosko]

Korben is right. I have read the scripts on rampant exploration of young by gays also. IMO though you have to look further down the rabbit hole though. Male pedophila has largely been the toast of the town among extremely wealthy .0001% men.

Destroying a young boy via pedophila and sodomy is as old as time. Nobody likes to look at the dark side of Feminism past the 'twigger warnings', skirts, etc to the dark nature that now more and more men are growing up submissive and are more easy (or willing) to be exploited sexually. Once you destroy a man physically from sodomy he is a damaged and neutered man for ever. You spend 5 mins on sites like Fetlife you realize there is a LARGE segment of dudes (low key of course) whom are so drained of male energy, actively enjoy sodomy these days, and not even from other men but from women. The ultimate destroyed and weak modern man is so broken that he prefers a woman sodomize him then anything else... That's the end goal. They want men weak and feeble like that. Literally incapable of any sort of natural male actions.

But going down the rabbit hole you have to unpack the levels of femenism wholesale. I refuse to give the women credit... They aren't moving the wheels on this thing..

The women in Femenism think if you change society the boys will change... Misguided.

The beta/omega males whom do the minion work for Femenism think it's a scientific problem, and that you need to tame them from additives to food or water... Working, but people are opting out if they can.

The elite men whom bankrolled Femenism to begin with know the real deal. You don't break men until you break then physically while they are young. Many of these elite men are bisexual because they don't want to risk impregnating some random woman (bloodline reasons not even money), and so they prefer casual relations with young boys instead. This has been going on for centruries as it's been the way the ultra wealthy can protect their bloodlines and wealth.

Child-smuggling rings have been running known in countries forever. In America it got it's first look at it in the 70s with child smuggling rings that were brutalizing young boys. It reached so high up to the point the White House was linked when it was randomly bringing in young gay men, many whom were supposed rejects and smuggled kids. When normal CIA folks tried to investigate the child rings the investigation was called as the CIA was actively involved in the smuggling of these children.

FBI child-pimp raid ignores pedophile elite (Press TV):
http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/07/30...afficking/

“Homosexual prostitution inquiry ensnares VIPs with Reagan, Bush: ‘Call boys’ took midnight tour of White House" (Washington Post):
educate-yourself.org/tg/franklincoverupexcerptwashtimesphoto.shtml

It's always been a elite thing. Comply government uses it as a pay day. Human trafficking is big money and government actively via select immigration policies leave back doors open for trafficking to exist. The mafia just does the logistics, they aren't the maestros. With pedophila the average perverse gay man is just enjoying the spoils of a currier system that is pumping more and more damned boys for easy exploitation by the complex of control I outlined above; they aren't the maestros either.

[Truth Teller]

(05-20-2014 01:41 AM)KorbenDallas Wrote:  

Gays tend to be the largest percentage of pedophiles. I used to think like Agastya, but after seeing the video recently of teachers pushing homosexuality on 5 year olds, the pictures of the catamite training camp that Samseau posted and the news coming out of the reign of terror that goes on in Hollywood regarding the gay directors that abuse you children ages 11-16, I don't think like him anymore.

Agastya is in college and it's "cool" to be pro-gay in the US now, so, I'm not saying Agastya'e hearts in the wrong place, but your wrong about what's going on in the US. Gay's are celebrated in the US, not bullied. I've never seen a gay treated anything but better than normal and I grew up in the midwest. Furthermore, Bill Price author of the "Spearhead" wrote an article that talked about how jobless young men were being sexually abused in Seattle by its gay community. Obviously this gets no press. I am sure some gay men just want to be left alone, but there is a large percentage of them that are predators and pedophiles.

This is an opinion I've only come around to in the last 5 months, however, I am more confident in my views on gays now than I was before when i went along with the live and let live speal. Quite frankly I don't care what gays do as long as their consenting adults. I have a problem with the gay card being used to mask the predatory nature of these men, who, prey not on equals, but young children.

By the way, I was hit on as a young child by gay men in multiple occasions where if I didn't freak out they would have took advantage of me, so, don't give me the whole, "Gay's aren't really child molesters, but but that's ridiculous!"

For the record, I'm pretty ambivalent towards the whole gay/lesbian rights thing. I'm not going to call someone who comes out a hero or any of that bullshit. I think that they're choosing to live the "gay lifestyle" (homosexuality largely isn't a choice, but the lifestyle associated with it is).

I believe that the reason why it's so prevalent in the United States now is because people really don't give a fuck anymore. 10 years ago, people were voting left and right for marriage bans and the like. People are tired of hearing gays demand equal rights and everything else. I know I am, and I'm 18. It's such a non-issue to me.

I actually know a gay man who's very opposed to most of the gay community. He believes that they go about trying to get equal rights in the wrong way, and that a lot of what people try to use as reasons for gay rights is nonsense. My opinion is that they're people too. As long as they don't bother anyone, they shouldn't be touched. Once they do, they have to face the consequences.

By the way, about gays trying to harass people: my experience is not with a gay male, but with a lesbian. I know a lesbian who consistently tries to force me into hooking up with other men. I constantly tell her no. Is there some compulsion in these people that forces them to try to force others to share their lifestyle?

[Parlay44]

Being gay is a mental illness. It serves no purpose in nature or society except maybe to keep the fashion industry going

I think it's part nature(chemical imbalance in the brain) and part nurture(lack of a strong male role model in life). Which ever it happens to be I still say it's not normal by moral standards, medical standards and nature.

They need at least psychological attention if not some help from psychopharmacology.

We dope up kids with Ritalin just for being precocious kids yet there is nothing "wrong" with gays. Give me a break.

If being gay is a choice then they're perverts and sexual deviants. If they're "born that way" then it's a medical condition like MS and should be treated as such.

[TigerMandingo]

^ Right on. My mom's a psychiatrist and firmly believes that it's a mental illness. In fact, it was listed on the DSM up until the 70s when gays lobbied to have it removed.