The other day, a friend invited me to take a cup of tea in a café. It was a usual café, except that this friend has got connections. He is well connected in his circle and girls think of him highly (or badly, doesn't matter but they do think of him).
So some of his female friends sat next to us. The male/female ratio was skewed to our favor (2/3) and he already has a fiancee. Suddenly I found that the girls were gaming me (probably because I had a nice car and wear handsomely). I dropped the case, none of them was 6+.
But this got me thinking into these two scenarios:
1. You are great at game. You hit the venues/bars alone and you try hardcore/dry game. You try to attract girls, talk to them, get them to know you... There are lots of risks here (girls with boyfriends/husbands, bi-sexual, not really into sex, girls with problems....) and also the reward is really small and risky.
2. You have great logistics: Let say you have a good social circles of highly connected guys. They invite you to a small party/café of 7/8 persons and they talk well about you. I see that this could transfer this power/game from them to you almost instantly. All you need to do now is to do the usual game. Your odds here are high, the girls are good/ready. You just need to figure out which one is most interested and do your part of the game.
This is driving some conclusion to me: Doing game for experience is good, but doing it to get women is a bad idea. You should spend that time building and making your logistics and then the game becomes easier. Logistics will make women more accessible, make an initial game and filter/prepare them.
Also logistics can grow and multiply, while a single day game is just that: A single day game. And then you have to work again.
I'm thinking about just like thinking about capital. If you have capital, you don't need to work again. Sure some work is required to withdraw the money, place it in investments, wisely spend it... but if you don't have capital, you'll have to work everyday of the year to make money.
Your thoughts?
So some of his female friends sat next to us. The male/female ratio was skewed to our favor (2/3) and he already has a fiancee. Suddenly I found that the girls were gaming me (probably because I had a nice car and wear handsomely). I dropped the case, none of them was 6+.
But this got me thinking into these two scenarios:
1. You are great at game. You hit the venues/bars alone and you try hardcore/dry game. You try to attract girls, talk to them, get them to know you... There are lots of risks here (girls with boyfriends/husbands, bi-sexual, not really into sex, girls with problems....) and also the reward is really small and risky.
2. You have great logistics: Let say you have a good social circles of highly connected guys. They invite you to a small party/café of 7/8 persons and they talk well about you. I see that this could transfer this power/game from them to you almost instantly. All you need to do now is to do the usual game. Your odds here are high, the girls are good/ready. You just need to figure out which one is most interested and do your part of the game.
This is driving some conclusion to me: Doing game for experience is good, but doing it to get women is a bad idea. You should spend that time building and making your logistics and then the game becomes easier. Logistics will make women more accessible, make an initial game and filter/prepare them.
Also logistics can grow and multiply, while a single day game is just that: A single day game. And then you have to work again.
I'm thinking about just like thinking about capital. If you have capital, you don't need to work again. Sure some work is required to withdraw the money, place it in investments, wisely spend it... but if you don't have capital, you'll have to work everyday of the year to make money.
Your thoughts?