[amity]

And flagged as 'one of the most sexist websites on the internet'!

You have to laugh really, the writer focuses on two of the more lascivious articles on the site (both of which are hilarious and which are at least in part, tongue in cheek) and neglects to mention all the other topics RoK covers including indepth and very informative articles on travel, literature, economics, etc
She then proceeds to lump RoK in with Cosmo! (words fail me)
Anyway, end result will be more traffic coming RoK's way from enraged Dublin leftoids(both male and female, of which they are many in this city), and I wouldn't be surprised to see this (and quite likely Roosh as well) picked up by some of the MSM in Ireland in the near future

[Architekt]

(07-05-2013 06:31 AM)amity Wrote:  

And flagged as 'one of the most sexist websites on the internet'!
[..]
She
[..]

Well colour me surprised.

Going to be a lot of confused, angry people, when the first like 5 articles have literally nothing to do with sex, except the one that supports monogomy, and men wanting faithful wives...

[DickDastardly]

delete

[Roosh]

I originally read this as "most sexiest website".

[Exactaking]

I remember seeing a site badmouthing Roosh, but they misread the V and kept calling it Roosh 5. I think they guy was IRT, because he badmouthed the racial totem pole article. The weird thing is, despite saying it was wrong to judge on background (which is genetics) he went on to say us RVFers are genetially inferior and therefore are on this site

Can't find the link.

[JimNortonFan]

[Thomas the Rhymer]

I find it interesting that modern day journalism consists of doing a google search and then discussing the results of your google search.

[Tuthmosis]