As I'm taking my first steps in day game, I've found out that while going indirect I have hard time keeping the convo alive after the first sentences about the whatever prop she has.
For example I've opened a girl about her MacBook, asking about how good is it, how different from PC ect didn't held much.
She mentioned that she use it for her studies to which I asked "what do you study?" and she kinda shut down and the convo died quickly.
Was it too fast too soon? it was a minute or two into the convo.
For me it's seemed like the right thing to do, am I wrong or is it just Toronto?
Also, after the initial topic died and she didn't gave you any leadait, and ignored yours will it be a good idea to Hail Mary it and just go direct?
And on unrelated girl, damn flakes.
A girl I've pulled from OKC, sent me few IOIs,
She made a bitch comment on our first chat, andsend an apologies and that she didn't meant to shot me down, and almost throw her number on me.
So as I was texting for a date, she said she was fully booked for the week, same thing the week after that, I've replayed with "You keep saying that, I don't think it means what you think it means" and she said that she's available next week (happened to be this week), and that she will be happy to meet me.
I followed the forum idea of withholding the place and time till a day or two beforehand, and gave her the info two days ago, she replied withing a minute (!).
Today morning (11:45), she flaked saying she has a "killer throat infection", I've ignored her.
At 16:00 (as if she waited till that hour for me to reply), she texted "Unless you want too nap in the park
" (quote)
Usually I just next or hit with a mass text a week or two after, but given the history, I really don't know what to make out of this.
My guts tells me to act differently then the usual ignore, what do you think?
Thanks guys.
For example I've opened a girl about her MacBook, asking about how good is it, how different from PC ect didn't held much.
She mentioned that she use it for her studies to which I asked "what do you study?" and she kinda shut down and the convo died quickly.
Was it too fast too soon? it was a minute or two into the convo.
For me it's seemed like the right thing to do, am I wrong or is it just Toronto?
Also, after the initial topic died and she didn't gave you any leadait, and ignored yours will it be a good idea to Hail Mary it and just go direct?
And on unrelated girl, damn flakes.
A girl I've pulled from OKC, sent me few IOIs,
She made a bitch comment on our first chat, andsend an apologies and that she didn't meant to shot me down, and almost throw her number on me.
So as I was texting for a date, she said she was fully booked for the week, same thing the week after that, I've replayed with "You keep saying that, I don't think it means what you think it means" and she said that she's available next week (happened to be this week), and that she will be happy to meet me.
I followed the forum idea of withholding the place and time till a day or two beforehand, and gave her the info two days ago, she replied withing a minute (!).
Today morning (11:45), she flaked saying she has a "killer throat infection", I've ignored her.
At 16:00 (as if she waited till that hour for me to reply), she texted "Unless you want too nap in the park
![[Image: wink.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Usually I just next or hit with a mass text a week or two after, but given the history, I really don't know what to make out of this.
My guts tells me to act differently then the usual ignore, what do you think?
Thanks guys.