Quote: (03-11-2013 03:36 PM)Icarus Wrote:
Quote: (03-10-2013 06:52 PM)ElBorrachoInfamoso Wrote:
I started an account on SA. A lot of those girls are delusional 6s and below who think some rich is going to pay the same price to bang them that he'd pay for an escort.
Indeed, take a look at these deluded fuglies and the beta chumps who pay for their services:
Classic feminist dominated main stream media (ABC 20/20) hachet job - focus on two low value unattractive 4's - one of which is an admitted fraud going "under cover" as if some criminal enterprise were about to be uncovered and then feign Shock Shock Shock that successful wealthy men are willing to pay the bills for sexy attractive young women who keep foolishly indebting themselves with heavy student loans for low/no earning degrees (music) that will never pay off the loans - and the men during their initial
arrangement dates screenings actually come out and ask if the "reporter" fraud wasting their time "will have sex with them?" as part of a consenting adult relationship? As though her lesbian gaggle of fister sisters does not expect the same over some wine, cheese and crackers unless they find some beta willing to settle for a 3-4 and be their mortgage and DNA child support mule for them and their hideous spawn for the next 25 years.
Would any man on RVF look twice at these poster girls for male sexploitation they featured here?
The typically SA or EM (
seeking arrangement or established men) female member knows her situation and the attractive ones are just looking for a guy that has the ability to enjoy an upscale life rather than some scrub who she has to pay his bills as well as hers. These sites do have a few hags but also many very sexy and attractive ladies looking for a good man without the match.com marriage or common law wife divorce lottery sugar plum fairies dancing around their hampster brains.
Question is with common law evolving into extreme PC lunacy does one need an
arrangement agreement along the lines of a prenup to establish the relationship as basically FWB friends with benefits and NOT a marriage, pre-marriage or worse common law marriage. As usual the states family/divorce law attorneys (raging feminists) will have their claws into anywhere they smell money and can grab their 33%. No worse than hooking up day or night game style with your local snowflakes.
All in all more likely to get what you want without the nasty legal side effects in an
arrangement than the alternatives as at least these ladies know the score the moment they sign up.
The way I am currently screening females is to determine if they are a spinnaker or sea anchor in my life - will they buy into and work towards a common vision for living our lives as companions or will they keep taking down and wasting the bricks (dollars) I use to build my life and legacy.
Words mean nothing of course and their actions everything when screening these ladies.
Is she a real partner or just a stealth legal life pirate.