[thegmanifesto]

Always good to look at for ideas:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2013/...ref=travel

Marseille is at #2.

Bhutan #5. Anyone been?

Montenegro #12:

[kenny_powers]

The girl in photo #7 = would bang!

DC at #44? Look at the fatties in the photo. I really never should have left Miami for this town.

[Technics]

Nice post. Agreed, always good to mine different sources for ideas, even if they are less than reliable.

Marseilles has always intrigued me for the high number of Maghreb girls (Moroccan, Algerian, Tunisian, Mauritanian), with the Muslim oppressive attitudes softened significantly by French cultural attitudes.

If I make it to France this year, I'm fairly certain Marseilles will be a go.

[thegmanifesto]

(01-11-2013 03:46 PM)kenny_powers Wrote:  

The girl in photo #7 = would bang!

DC at #44? Look at the fatties in the photo. I really never should have left Miami for this town.

Ha.

That restaurant looks kind of sick though. Especially if you replaced the girls in the picture with Models.

But then you would have a spot in Miami Beach, not DC.

[freshcream]

Cool. I am in Rio right now, and just spent 3 months in Nicaragua. Would like to visit a lot of these places.

But.

First the spanish speaking ones. And the cheap ones.

[durangotang]

Wow, D.C. people look like fat.

[Timoteo]

The Times travel section is excellent - I really like the "36 Hours" pieces they do. Guys here tend to forget that magazines and newspapers don't scout out places based on the women and how to bang them...HA HA! Check out sites from a tourism aspect, and I travel for those reasons as well as for the women. I see Hvar, Croatia, made the list too, which Roosh gave a so-so review I think.

[TheBulldozer]

(01-12-2013 04:09 PM)Timoteo Wrote:  

The Times travel section is excellent - I really like the "36 Hours" pieces they do. Guys here tend to forget that magazines and newspapers don't scout out places based on the women and how to bang them...HA HA! Check out sites from a tourism aspect, and I travel for those reasons as well as for the women.

They did Queens the other week. I have to say...I was pretty disappointed in its quality. I could've come up with some better ideas than they did.

[Timoteo]

I like that they pick some places that most wouldn't think of going. This list had some interesting places on it, many that I've never heard of. It's always going to be hit or miss, but I like that they really dig in to places and try to find places off the beaten path. It gives you new ideas about places to visit.

[WestIndianArchie]

(01-11-2013 05:17 PM)durangotang Wrote:  

Wow, D.C. people look like fat.

Any realistic picture of the US should show fat people, or as we call them, people.

WIA

[thegmanifesto]

(01-12-2013 04:09 PM)Timoteo Wrote:  

The Times travel section is excellent - I really like the "36 Hours" pieces they do. Guys here tend to forget that magazines and newspapers don't scout out places based on the women and how to bang them...HA HA! Check out sites from a tourism aspect, and I travel for those reasons as well as for the women. I see Hvar, Croatia, made the list too, which Roosh gave a so-so review I think.

I know people on here hate NYtimes, but I have always thought their travel section is great.

Especially on hotels, reastaurants, and bars in the 36 hours section.

[temujin]

Not a bad list.

But they're way off if they think Montenegro is still "undiscovered":

You don't really want to be competing with people who can afford to buy entire islands:





For further reading on Montenegro:

http://www.torontolife.com/daily/informe...munkistan/


In general, I've never, ever liked the vibe of places in Europe where rich yacht owners congregate.

It always seems to be composed of wrinkled, sunburnt men with white air, their overly baked wives/girlfriends, and jaded service workers and wanna-be douchebags.

[Timoteo]

(01-13-2013 02:45 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

(01-12-2013 04:09 PM)Timoteo Wrote:  

The Times travel section is excellent - I really like the "36 Hours" pieces they do. Guys here tend to forget that magazines and newspapers don't scout out places based on the women and how to bang them...HA HA! Check out sites from a tourism aspect, and I travel for those reasons as well as for the women. I see Hvar, Croatia, made the list too, which Roosh gave a so-so review I think.

I know people on here hate NYtimes, but I have always thought their travel section is great.

Especially on hotels, reastaurants, and bars in the 36 hours section.

No doubt. I mean the Times is a HUGE newspaper, with many sections (especially the Sunday Times). There's plenty in there. It amuses me how folks want to dismiss a whole publication because of the opinions/slant of a couple of sections.

[InternationPlayboy]

(01-11-2013 03:58 PM)Technics Wrote:  

Nice post. Agreed, always good to mine different sources for ideas, even if they are less than reliable.

Marseilles has always intrigued me for the high number of Maghreb girls (Moroccan, Algerian, Tunisian, Mauritanian), with the Muslim oppressive attitudes softened significantly by French cultural attitudes.

If I make it to France this year, I'm fairly certain Marseilles will be a go.

I've found there are a lot of Muslims in France (While working at a hotel that catered to a majority of French guests, the French are also assholes for the most part, the stereotype is very accurate), and the women are pretty damn good looking. It seems they would be easier in Europe than in their home countries. My last girlfriend was Turkish, I loved her look and she was one of the best lays I've ever had. She was a good LTR girl, probably would make a good mother as well. Very feminine. Girls from that region are my favorite after latinas.

[Vitriol]

Nicaragua looks great based on the picture they used. I've talked to some girls in Miami that were Nicaraguan and really good looking.

I'd be curious to see if anyone can recommend making the trip.