Hi,
This has probably been posted before, but anyway:
The biggest misconception and myth that is perpetrated by this site, is that women and their quality is a product of cultural conditioning and "consumerism". I would say that feminism has had the full brunt of fault when it comes to explaining the American girl warped by self-entitled princess syndrome.
While I agree that feminism has a fundamental and pivotal effect on the state of women today, I don't think its as polarising as the manosphere make it out to be.
An Alternative theory
I spent a fair bit diving through feminist literature and trying to come up with a proper explanation as to why American feminism is the way it is, and why the status quo, in European feminism is fundamentally different. Some would say it's the waves, but I think there is something governing everything on a more deeper scale. For this reason, I and a friend of mine, looked at it from an economic perspective.
Why this site is fundamentally flawed
You're encouraging men to go to certain countries, basically diluting the market, and changing the behavior of the women in the process, then complaining about it in the next video post. Economics determine everything. A slight quiver in the dating pool, can send a disastrous butterfly effect that will completely change the way women perceive you.
This has been touched on before, but I don't think men actually realise how strong the variables are. Everything from attention-spans to feminine behavior to intelligence are determined by economic variables. The more men there are in a particular location, the more slothy and decadent, and entitled women get. The less men there are, the more insecure, penis envious, fragile, slim, intelligent women become.
A girl who masters the art of attention, is fixated from the dopamine she gets from sexual validation. She binges on it, and she can't bare intelligent long conversation while she's not getting her fix. The amount of sexual validation she gets is proportional to the supply of men who give it to her.
Your bang books are also relative, they depict the situation relative to the economics at a particular time. You send 100 or so men to a city in Poland, and the material becomes irrelevant.
This has probably been posted before, but anyway:
The biggest misconception and myth that is perpetrated by this site, is that women and their quality is a product of cultural conditioning and "consumerism". I would say that feminism has had the full brunt of fault when it comes to explaining the American girl warped by self-entitled princess syndrome.
While I agree that feminism has a fundamental and pivotal effect on the state of women today, I don't think its as polarising as the manosphere make it out to be.
An Alternative theory
I spent a fair bit diving through feminist literature and trying to come up with a proper explanation as to why American feminism is the way it is, and why the status quo, in European feminism is fundamentally different. Some would say it's the waves, but I think there is something governing everything on a more deeper scale. For this reason, I and a friend of mine, looked at it from an economic perspective.
Why this site is fundamentally flawed
You're encouraging men to go to certain countries, basically diluting the market, and changing the behavior of the women in the process, then complaining about it in the next video post. Economics determine everything. A slight quiver in the dating pool, can send a disastrous butterfly effect that will completely change the way women perceive you.
This has been touched on before, but I don't think men actually realise how strong the variables are. Everything from attention-spans to feminine behavior to intelligence are determined by economic variables. The more men there are in a particular location, the more slothy and decadent, and entitled women get. The less men there are, the more insecure, penis envious, fragile, slim, intelligent women become.
A girl who masters the art of attention, is fixated from the dopamine she gets from sexual validation. She binges on it, and she can't bare intelligent long conversation while she's not getting her fix. The amount of sexual validation she gets is proportional to the supply of men who give it to her.
Your bang books are also relative, they depict the situation relative to the economics at a particular time. You send 100 or so men to a city in Poland, and the material becomes irrelevant.
![[Image: troll.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/new/troll.gif)