http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/opinio...-them.html
I'd recommend getting a vomit receptacle handy before clicking on the link.
While the motives of the guy writing this (poorly written, factually inaccurate) article are hard enough to fathom, I think the more interesting question to ask oneself is why a 'reputable' paper like the new york times would print such drivel. Who exactly are they printing this for, and what are they trying to sell, other than more newspapers?
I think the answers are clear enough to most readers of this forum. Sometimes I think the whole "manhood-under-seige" mentality is a little overblown, maybe even a little on the "conspiracy-theory" side of things. Then I read something like this . . .
I'd recommend getting a vomit receptacle handy before clicking on the link.
While the motives of the guy writing this (poorly written, factually inaccurate) article are hard enough to fathom, I think the more interesting question to ask oneself is why a 'reputable' paper like the new york times would print such drivel. Who exactly are they printing this for, and what are they trying to sell, other than more newspapers?
I think the answers are clear enough to most readers of this forum. Sometimes I think the whole "manhood-under-seige" mentality is a little overblown, maybe even a little on the "conspiracy-theory" side of things. Then I read something like this . . .