rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


NY Times: Does a More Equal Marriage Mean Less Sex?
#1

NY Times: Does a More Equal Marriage Mean Less Sex?

http://nyti.ms/1cXAhzT

Roissy's been saying this for a while, but here it is, tucked away in the MSM. It's a long article so I'll pull some choice quotes for a cliff's notes:

Quote:Quote:

A study called “Egalitarianism, Housework and Sexual Frequency in Marriage,” which appeared in The American Sociological Review last year, surprised many, precisely because it went against the logical assumption that as marriages improve by becoming more equal, the sex in these marriages will improve, too. Instead, it found that when men did certain kinds of chores around the house, couples had less sex. Specifically, if men did all of what the researchers characterized as feminine chores like folding laundry, cooking or vacuuming — the kinds of things many women say they want their husbands to do — then couples had sex 1.5 fewer times per month than those with husbands who did what were considered masculine chores, like taking out the trash or fixing the car. It wasn’t just the frequency that was affected, either — at least for the wives. The more traditional the division of labor, meaning the greater the husband’s share of masculine chores compared with feminine ones, the greater his wife’s reported sexual satisfaction.

And the author goes on to relate from her professional experience:

Quote:Quote:

But as a psychotherapist who works with couples, I’ve noticed something similar to the findings. That is, it’s true that being stuck with all the chores rarely tends to make wives desire their husbands. Yet having their partner, say, load the dishwasher — a popular type of marital intervention suggested by self-help books, women’s magazines and therapists alike — doesn’t seem to have much of an effect on their libido, either. Many of my colleagues have observed the same thing: No matter how much sink-scrubbing and grocery-shopping the husband does, no matter how well husband and wife communicate with each other, no matter how sensitive they are to each other’s emotions and work schedules, the wife does not find her husband more sexually exciting, even if she feels both closer to and happier with him.

and the piece de resistance:

Quote:Quote:

Brines believes the quandary many couples find themselves in comes down to this: “The less gender differentiation, the less sexual desire.” In other words, in an attempt to be gender-neutral, we may have become gender-neutered.

one more:
Quote:Quote:

While past research has shown that men have higher rates of infidelity than women, those rates are becoming increasingly similar, particularly in younger people in developed countries, where recent studies have found no gender differences in extramarital sex among men and women under 40. This may be because younger women are more likely to be in peer marriages — and conditions in peer marriages make female infidelity more probable than in traditional ones.

The problem with this article is that the author trying to dance around the issue of sex - basically saying "well, not having sex doesn't mean you're not happy". She refuses to recognize the obvious answers, though. The conclusion is that marriage is more about finding a long term roommate. In a couple years, maybe she'll have a followup article exploring why men don't want to get married anymore.

An aside, I learned a new term from this article, "lesbian bed death". According to Wikipedia, the term comes from a finding that "lesbian couples in committed relationships have less sex than any other type of couple, and they generally experience less sexual intimacy the longer the relationship lasts."[/quote]
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)