[kosko]

(11-28-2013 07:25 PM)Andy_B Wrote:  

(11-28-2013 07:10 PM)kosko Wrote:  

There is no such thing as a "Beta" or "Alpha" Female; the paradigm is switched for them. A "Omega" female would be needy and submissive, aka ideal, while a "Alpha" female would be hard pressed to differentiate from a Man.

... Wha?

Women have hierarchies of their own, an "alpha" female is more subtle and tactful than an alpha male but her relationship toward other women is still a dominant one.

What does that mean?

Again there is no such thing as a Alpha female. There is a circle, not liner line of hierarchy between the sexes with the opposite ends attract each other.



A woman possessing "Alpha" dominate traits is not describable. The most "Alpha" women is still weaker then the most weak omega male, but a submissive and kind feminine women holds immense power over a omega male. Think about this for a second. Think of how silly the idea of a "alpha" female sounds. I always hear women talk about this and I laugh, there is no such thing as an Alpha female in the sense that we describe
Alpha males. The ideal and most "powerful" female will always be the feminine submissive one, and submissive and weak traits are more in tuned to the Omega then to the Alpha.

Its a play of energy between the sexes, the opposites pull and push off each other to advance movement. Strong men want weak women, and weak women want strong men. The most extremes off the non-ideal ends mirror the opposite sex, a butch female is closer to a man, while a omega male is closer to a woman.