After reading that Jezebel article, I am astounded about how people who work in media don't have a single clue about how media actually works. I know, I shouldn't be surprised.
The article talks about how people should help people in shitty situations.
![[Image: facepalm2.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/new/facepalm2.gif)
First off, was this criticism seriously laid out with the Steubenville debacle? Nope, it had to be about evil, entitled men and patriarchal society enabling them, not how someone filmed it and did nothing to stop the finger banging. Any women around stopping the boys? No - they have been taught by media to fear situations like this, run away and go to the proper authorities. Also, inform a local feminist, as she will post angry posts on the web with painfully obvious moral sentiments.
Nobody stopped to help because we teach children that power is only exterted by two groups:
1. The bad guys.
2. The authorities (police, parents, teachers, media figures)
Next you debate guns, if you are anti-gun, remember this and see how it affects your views.
Second, is what "shitty situation" is being referred to? The fact the woman is distraught because millions of people have watched her suck dick instead of tens of thousands? Or is it implying she had have been sexually assaulted?
This highlights that sexual assault isn't just the fallback option for women's insecurity about the expression of their sexuality, but sexual assault will be read into any event involving heterosexuality and women's untoward feelings. Not the actual woman in X story, but the women reading about the story.
If you think this dynamic can be altered by MRA's or whatever, go take a cold shower.
The media Leviathan is so encompassing now, it cannot be reversed. Some girl in Britain killed herself over trolls and assholes on the web. Think about it. She could have turned off the computer and all of it would have went away. Now geniuses are wanting tight laws restricting "hate" speech. No, it is restricting speech that viciously exposes your true self-esteem.
As far as reading sexual assault into this situation, it is an out-dated approach to handling female sexual indiscretion. The prevailing sentiment cannot understand the exposure of the reality of female sexuality. Cries of rape and sexual assault will only heighten as puritans who cannot admit how women work still dominate the social conversation.
Roosh is right they are upset about the man not getting shamed, but what they miss isn't he is applauded, it is just they don't give a shit about him because he is a man, a passing concern, a role player here.
That is because of collective female narcissism. If Jezzybell wanted to talk about him, they would. They don't. So STFU feminisrs. And we should stop using the word feminist because it means nothing beyond female self-absorption - they more narcissistic she is, the stronger of a feminist she is
The article talks about how people should help people in shitty situations.
First off, was this criticism seriously laid out with the Steubenville debacle? Nope, it had to be about evil, entitled men and patriarchal society enabling them, not how someone filmed it and did nothing to stop the finger banging. Any women around stopping the boys? No - they have been taught by media to fear situations like this, run away and go to the proper authorities. Also, inform a local feminist, as she will post angry posts on the web with painfully obvious moral sentiments.
Nobody stopped to help because we teach children that power is only exterted by two groups:
1. The bad guys.
2. The authorities (police, parents, teachers, media figures)
Next you debate guns, if you are anti-gun, remember this and see how it affects your views.
Second, is what "shitty situation" is being referred to? The fact the woman is distraught because millions of people have watched her suck dick instead of tens of thousands? Or is it implying she had have been sexually assaulted?
This highlights that sexual assault isn't just the fallback option for women's insecurity about the expression of their sexuality, but sexual assault will be read into any event involving heterosexuality and women's untoward feelings. Not the actual woman in X story, but the women reading about the story.
If you think this dynamic can be altered by MRA's or whatever, go take a cold shower.
The media Leviathan is so encompassing now, it cannot be reversed. Some girl in Britain killed herself over trolls and assholes on the web. Think about it. She could have turned off the computer and all of it would have went away. Now geniuses are wanting tight laws restricting "hate" speech. No, it is restricting speech that viciously exposes your true self-esteem.
As far as reading sexual assault into this situation, it is an out-dated approach to handling female sexual indiscretion. The prevailing sentiment cannot understand the exposure of the reality of female sexuality. Cries of rape and sexual assault will only heighten as puritans who cannot admit how women work still dominate the social conversation.
Roosh is right they are upset about the man not getting shamed, but what they miss isn't he is applauded, it is just they don't give a shit about him because he is a man, a passing concern, a role player here.
That is because of collective female narcissism. If Jezzybell wanted to talk about him, they would. They don't. So STFU feminisrs. And we should stop using the word feminist because it means nothing beyond female self-absorption - they more narcissistic she is, the stronger of a feminist she is