This e-mail is on point and yes, American men would be better served adopting Latin style game.
The dynamic this e-mail describes is one of the primary roadblocks to the expansion of American style feminism beyond a trivial level in a handful of nations: other men (Africans, arabs, asians of almost all kinds, and Latins) simply do not put up with the bullshit. The feminine imperative would need their acquiescence to start making headway in their countries, and those men simply will not roll over the way Americans will. Even the seemingly soft Japanese male isn't taking that crap.
We complain a lot about feminism here and some of the challenges men deal with, but many of them are, in fact, caused by male acquiescence. American men allow their women to badmouth them in public with no consequences, flake with no consequences, cheat and cuckold their men with no consequences, and dig for gold with no consequences. Women here know they can basically behave in any way they please and still have reasonably decent men willing to get with them and even praise them. There is not a single breed of man on Earth that allows their women to walk all over them to quite the extent that American men do.
I agree, but I'd get even more specific: the main purveyor of this beta male crap is the Anglo-European (white American, Australian, British, NZ, Canadian), closely followed by select Northern European peers (Scandinavians and perhaps the Germans).
This is why the anglosphere (USA, UK, Australia, Canada) is so much worse when it comes to female quality and entitlement than other parts of the world. Anglo and Northern European men are, on a global scale, the most prone to pedestalization of any men on Earth.
Eastern European men don't play that crap, and Mediterranean men are also much less prone to rolling over. The rest of the world has even less tolerance-you just will not see Africans, East/South/West Asians or Latinos supplicating in the way these men do. This is why we seem so in awe of their women relative to the ones we find here.
The biggest source of female/feminist arrogance and entitlement is the way these men worship their women. Women are only getting away with what they are allowed to get away with-they cannot force anything to happen without male acquiescence.
The best defence against the kind of anti-male feminism that dominates here in the USA is men stepping up, ceasing to roll over and then actually being men. Women simply won't respect anything else.
The dynamic this e-mail describes is one of the primary roadblocks to the expansion of American style feminism beyond a trivial level in a handful of nations: other men (Africans, arabs, asians of almost all kinds, and Latins) simply do not put up with the bullshit. The feminine imperative would need their acquiescence to start making headway in their countries, and those men simply will not roll over the way Americans will. Even the seemingly soft Japanese male isn't taking that crap.
We complain a lot about feminism here and some of the challenges men deal with, but many of them are, in fact, caused by male acquiescence. American men allow their women to badmouth them in public with no consequences, flake with no consequences, cheat and cuckold their men with no consequences, and dig for gold with no consequences. Women here know they can basically behave in any way they please and still have reasonably decent men willing to get with them and even praise them. There is not a single breed of man on Earth that allows their women to walk all over them to quite the extent that American men do.
Quote: (08-26-2012 10:03 PM)MikeCF Wrote:
Persian men are the same way.
Go to a Persian thanksgiving or other gathering.
The older men are at one table and the women are at another.
All this beta male shit comes from the white man.
I agree, but I'd get even more specific: the main purveyor of this beta male crap is the Anglo-European (white American, Australian, British, NZ, Canadian), closely followed by select Northern European peers (Scandinavians and perhaps the Germans).
This is why the anglosphere (USA, UK, Australia, Canada) is so much worse when it comes to female quality and entitlement than other parts of the world. Anglo and Northern European men are, on a global scale, the most prone to pedestalization of any men on Earth.
Eastern European men don't play that crap, and Mediterranean men are also much less prone to rolling over. The rest of the world has even less tolerance-you just will not see Africans, East/South/West Asians or Latinos supplicating in the way these men do. This is why we seem so in awe of their women relative to the ones we find here.
The biggest source of female/feminist arrogance and entitlement is the way these men worship their women. Women are only getting away with what they are allowed to get away with-they cannot force anything to happen without male acquiescence.
The best defence against the kind of anti-male feminism that dominates here in the USA is men stepping up, ceasing to roll over and then actually being men. Women simply won't respect anything else.
Know your enemy and know yourself, find naught in fear for 100 battles. Know yourself but not your enemy, find level of loss and victory. Know thy enemy but not yourself, wallow in defeat every time.