Quote: (03-11-2015 12:38 AM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:
Quote: (03-10-2015 11:27 PM)cowboy Wrote:
A lot of comments about how feminism will hurt women more than men in the long run. Very true statement. How many years or generations do you think until women start to regret the "sex and the city" lifestyle? How much longer do you think until western society gets the picture? Especially with more and more unmarried women hitting the wall, being nothing but a pump and dump, no children, and having their canine pet as their only real companion.
It's hurting them now, no need to look to the future.
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/arch...lar/60211/
"The Two Income Trap.
The thesis is innovative and, I think, at least partly correct: that in many ways, two income families have made households less financially stable, not more so.
Among higher income families, much of the extra income has simply been poured into a bidding war with other higher income families for homes in good school districts.
Among lower income families, much of the extra income has gone to replacing home production with market production: convenience meals, work clothes, second cars, child care, and so forth."
So when women got into the workforce, instead of living in modest houses and saving money, she poured her earnings into a better house in a better school district (*cough white flight cough*). Because she needed to be sure that her children would be better educated. Is that because she wouldn't be there to go to the PTA or monitor what's going on with those 4th grade fractions? Hmm.
If you are a manosphere guy, this also means
- women bump men out of education
- working women bump men out of the career
- working women that become mothers, waste the investments that businesses put into them
If women weren't working today, how many men would be employed?
If women were cooking every day, what would child hood and adult hood obesity look like?
If women were at home taking care of children, and not sending them to daycare, letting them watch tv/dvd/play with Ipads, would we see ADHD in the same #'s?
I dunno. But a lot of American issues and issues in the Developed world track with the rise of women leaving their traditional spheres of influence.
The result of educating women, putting them in the work force, doubled the supply of available labor for the work force and arguably destabilized every economy and therefore everyone country wherever this has happened.
Even seeing this kind of correlation, can anyone honestly give me a good reason why a woman shouldn't go to school, and why she shouldn't be allowed to get a job?
I wonder what Red Pill guy thinks the Afghans are right about keeping their women ignorant and illiterate?
"We should put Caitlin in a burqa"
WIA
IMO my opinion and just quickly hashing this out, the perfect mix of what to do with women now men have advanced the world with technology...
- Allow women to have an education. Hold them to the same standards as men. Which means a very tiny fraction of women would go on to get advanced degrees. And most of the top jobs would go to men based on fair competition. Instead today we have one set of standards for men and another for women, and then women still manage to fail.
- Do NOT allow women to vote. As a compromise they don't pay taxes. Without women voting in a liberal wasteful govt. to replace the need for men in their lives, the loss of tax revenue will be no concern.
Most women's top contribution to a society will be through nurturing. Which is either being a mommy, or being a teacher of young children, or a nurse. Take women out of this role and often times they just cause chaos.