Insisting on due process, on fair treatment under the law is VERY PROGRESSIVE. It's very much in tune with social justice. We've fought wars on American soil over this. Had non-violent revolutions over this.
It's the same idea behind the rightful and righteous outrage when cops kill unarmed citizens. Or insisting that enemies, enemy combatants, non-citizens, and citizens are treated justly.
Part of the problem with the SJW's, mainstream media, and the manosphere, is that they haven't really studied politics, history, philosophy, economics, and the basics of science. All the pieces matter. Your pet policy has negative unintended consequences that you did not realize before hand.
It's the same problems the conservatives have when they want to be "strict constructionists". It's a neutral way of reading laws, but it doesn't always lead to the contemporary desired political results.
Liberals are cool with science you bring up all the pseudo-health crap at Whole Foods.
WIA
It's the same idea behind the rightful and righteous outrage when cops kill unarmed citizens. Or insisting that enemies, enemy combatants, non-citizens, and citizens are treated justly.
Part of the problem with the SJW's, mainstream media, and the manosphere, is that they haven't really studied politics, history, philosophy, economics, and the basics of science. All the pieces matter. Your pet policy has negative unintended consequences that you did not realize before hand.
It's the same problems the conservatives have when they want to be "strict constructionists". It's a neutral way of reading laws, but it doesn't always lead to the contemporary desired political results.
Liberals are cool with science you bring up all the pseudo-health crap at Whole Foods.
WIA
Quote: (10-16-2014 02:38 PM)DannyAlberta Wrote:
looking at the on-line bios available for many of the 28 current and former professors who signed on, it strikes me that many of them already were sjws (or at least progressives). this includes an advisor to the obama campaign. nonetheless, they oppose the new policy.
http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/bartholet/
http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/elhauge/bio.php
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/prs/field.html
http://www.nancygertner.com/
http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/suk/
https://www.law.ucla.edu/faculty/faculty...cie-white/
this is remarkable.