Quote: (08-15-2011 10:13 PM)oldnemesis Wrote:
Quote: (08-15-2011 09:04 AM)Samseau Wrote:
6-8 comes down to personal preference for most men, for sure. But your standards for judging mostly rely upon how other's perceive them.
Well, 8 cannot be just a personal preference. 4-7 could though.
Quote:Quote:
A 10 is top .01% of attractiveness for women,
A 9 is top 1%,
An 8 is top 4-5%,
A 7 is top 8%,
A 6 is top 15%
A 5 is top 35%
A 4 is top 70%,
Those are not realistic numbers. As any other characteristics, attractiveness is spread following the bell curve, so the difference should be significantly larger.
I'd have it different:
10 is a top 0.0000001%
9 is a top 0.05%
8 is top 2%
7 is top 10%
6 is top 30%
5 is top 63%
4 is top 96%
3 is bottom 4%
2 is bottom 0.5%
1 is bottom 0.001%
Of course, this curve applies to the whole Earth population, and may be very different in some places considering the picture above, Anglo countries being more skewed toward the bottom, and EE/Russia being more skewed toward the top.
Yes, your numbers are much better. I was just giving mine as an example.
Contributor at Return of Kings. I got banned from twatter, which is run by little bitches and weaklings. You can follow me on Gab.
Be sure to check out the easiest mining program around, FreedomXMR.