Having tried cases before juries, I know there is no point in bitching about some random jury verdict and trying to make a political point out of it. The jury heard the evidence over days, they saw the witnesses testify.
Even the widely-derided OJ verdict had factual bases - like proven manipulation of evidence by Dets. Fuhrman and VanAtter.
Maybe in this case the "victim" sounded like he was full of shit, or "regretted sex."
Men are also acquitted in rape trials - I've been defense counsel in a couple of them. I also saw a guy acquitted in a drunk sex case.
Even the widely-derided OJ verdict had factual bases - like proven manipulation of evidence by Dets. Fuhrman and VanAtter.
Maybe in this case the "victim" sounded like he was full of shit, or "regretted sex."
Men are also acquitted in rape trials - I've been defense counsel in a couple of them. I also saw a guy acquitted in a drunk sex case.