Forgot to add: their arrogance relates to that Need To Be Taken Seriously / Unique Snowflake post I wrote the other day.
They broadcast every thought they have via Social Media, assuming there is nothing wrong with it, because they are Educated, Intelligent and A Good Person.
They never stop to consider they are naively broadcasting every psychological flaw they have and identifying themselves as insufferable tone policers to potential employers.
I believe the universities encourage them to see these physical and psychological flaws as evidence of moral superiority. Obviously, it's a lazy way of expecting achievement than effort. Since they have been trained to see power, not shame, they overshare.
It's public. Why can't it be aggregated? Could someone seriously researching this analyse the data the point out that attendence to particular universities correlate with flawed reseasoning and unhealthy cognitive dissonance?
Could you find evidence of fallicious thinking in their posts, and knowing that these types of errors occur within certain IQ ranges and in certain personality types, then offer this information to potential employers - instead of illegal IQ testing - to filter out the unproductive dross in this new thought economy?
Hell, if you want Creative Thinking: if we're dealing in a thought economy, could some knowledgable, savvy men monetise this process and offer it to businesses, and make Human Resources irrelevant? How is it any different to Don'tDateHimGirl.com?
Galaxy Face on Twitter pointed out to Roosh the other day that she 'chooses to believe in equality'. Fallacious thinking: when it means she advances or feelings aren't hurt, then she's for it. When she's sexually-selecting male or female suitors, she filters via personalised prejudices against weight, height, hair, style, attractiveness etc.
If you hire her, expect flawed logic to possibly arise in any task she's given, and her to be more concerned with protecting feelings than getting the task done correctly.
They broadcast every thought they have via Social Media, assuming there is nothing wrong with it, because they are Educated, Intelligent and A Good Person.
They never stop to consider they are naively broadcasting every psychological flaw they have and identifying themselves as insufferable tone policers to potential employers.
I believe the universities encourage them to see these physical and psychological flaws as evidence of moral superiority. Obviously, it's a lazy way of expecting achievement than effort. Since they have been trained to see power, not shame, they overshare.
It's public. Why can't it be aggregated? Could someone seriously researching this analyse the data the point out that attendence to particular universities correlate with flawed reseasoning and unhealthy cognitive dissonance?
Could you find evidence of fallicious thinking in their posts, and knowing that these types of errors occur within certain IQ ranges and in certain personality types, then offer this information to potential employers - instead of illegal IQ testing - to filter out the unproductive dross in this new thought economy?
Hell, if you want Creative Thinking: if we're dealing in a thought economy, could some knowledgable, savvy men monetise this process and offer it to businesses, and make Human Resources irrelevant? How is it any different to Don'tDateHimGirl.com?
Galaxy Face on Twitter pointed out to Roosh the other day that she 'chooses to believe in equality'. Fallacious thinking: when it means she advances or feelings aren't hurt, then she's for it. When she's sexually-selecting male or female suitors, she filters via personalised prejudices against weight, height, hair, style, attractiveness etc.
If you hire her, expect flawed logic to possibly arise in any task she's given, and her to be more concerned with protecting feelings than getting the task done correctly.