My criticism stands. You're comparing a girl you know in real life, a SHITTY picture of her, to a magazine photo. Do you know how much work goes into that photo? How many hours were spent on that photo? It probably took 7 people, not including the model, at least one hour each to produce that photo. Makeup, hair, lighting, photographer, set, assistants, retouching. It's simply ridiculous to use that in any sort of objective metric to analyze beauty.
You're nuts, you keep going like this and the forum is going to turn into one of these:
You're nuts, you keep going like this and the forum is going to turn into one of these: