Quote:Quote:
You lost me there. What's racist about an ethnicity celebrating its history? Especially when that ethnicity had its history systematically ignored for so long. The key is to think of it in terms of ethnicity as opposed to race. Would you be offended by an Italian history month or an Irish history month? Are you offended by the Columbus and St. Patrick's Day parades?
Columbus Day is just slightly relevant, since it commemorates Western Europe finding out about the New World and and setting out to settle, colonize, civilize, and conquer it, which, whether we like it or not, pretty much marks the start of the Americas as we know them, and is a fairly huge deal. St. Patrick's day is an (originally) religious holiday celebrated principally among the Irish, and everyone who lives around or admires or is descended from them.
Black history month, on the other hand, is a purely novel designation to make white SWPLs (and maybe some blacks) feel good. There should be, in fairness, a White history month, a Semitic history month, a Red history month, (for American Indians) and a Yellow history month (for Asians) too. Otherwise, it's just racist singling-out of one minority for political purposes.
Nobody has some "right" to be remembered and talked about in history. History is a written record of important stuff that's happened in the past. That usually means leaders, the battles they fought, and the lasting and important changes they made. Prominence in historical records and studies is biased towards those events and men whose actions have more directly affected our lives today.
For most of recorded history, sub-Saharan Africans were living in objectively-primitive tribal societies which valued other things more than writing things down. Consequently, there is not that much history associated with them, and most of it has little relevance for anything outside of purely local matters, because the African tribes did not form strong states, turn into empires, and conquer large swaths of the world like, say, the Europeans, Arabs, Chinese, etc. And the blacks who came to the USA were not, in general, great leaders, but captured slaves, who were used for physical labor here, and whose descendants have formed a lower-class level of society. Not the people who typically become movers and shakers in history. Therefore, we should not be surprised when not a lot of attention is given to the great historical contributions of American Blacks, simply because, until relatively recently, they have not been of sufficient number or import to be very noticeable.