I commend France for this, and I say that in all seriousness. They are taking the ethos of homosexual union to its logical conclusion - if sapphists and sodomites are to have their own, equivalent form of marriage, the terms 'mother' and 'father' are clearly outdated.
I'm impressed that the French are doing this already; in America, we'd first institute 'gay marriage,' but this sort of move would be struck down as 'too PC.' Instead, it would happen five years later, after 'gay marriage' is taken for granted as normal and healthy.
Americans and Britons willfully ignore the logical implications of positions like 'gay marriage' or feminism. A few radical leftists will make clear the point of these policies among themselves, or decades later, such as how feminism frees women to be whores. Them aside, when anyone takes a principle to its natural conclusion, the Anglo castigates them as radicals and 'too-PC.' The Anglo is a fool, because he has already acceded to the original principle, and he must now reap his due rewards.
And rarely will you see the Anglo legitimately question his prior belief, eg that feminism destroys the things he holds dear in women, and opt to discard feminism entirely. No, he'll try to find a "third way" that somehow maintains feminism but keeps women from becoming whores. He tries to find some method that balances the conflict of visions. This third way never materializes, and he just ends up capitulating to the radicals again and again, as they open up new fronts and shift the frame of the debate.
In short, the issue was decided not by this latest proclamation, but by the endorsement of 'gay marriage;' this is just the natural result. If you really understood 'gay marriage,' you'd realize this really isn't making things much worse, because it was implicit already.
Imagine if someone bought tickets to a boxing match, and then went and got upset as soon as the fighters started boxing each other. You'd think they were a retard - that's the nature of the game, it's what you signed up for when you bought the tickets. Same for gay marriage - if you support it, and then start yelling about how the roles of mother and father are now being diminished - well, that was kind of inescapable.
I'm impressed that the French are doing this already; in America, we'd first institute 'gay marriage,' but this sort of move would be struck down as 'too PC.' Instead, it would happen five years later, after 'gay marriage' is taken for granted as normal and healthy.
Americans and Britons willfully ignore the logical implications of positions like 'gay marriage' or feminism. A few radical leftists will make clear the point of these policies among themselves, or decades later, such as how feminism frees women to be whores. Them aside, when anyone takes a principle to its natural conclusion, the Anglo castigates them as radicals and 'too-PC.' The Anglo is a fool, because he has already acceded to the original principle, and he must now reap his due rewards.
And rarely will you see the Anglo legitimately question his prior belief, eg that feminism destroys the things he holds dear in women, and opt to discard feminism entirely. No, he'll try to find a "third way" that somehow maintains feminism but keeps women from becoming whores. He tries to find some method that balances the conflict of visions. This third way never materializes, and he just ends up capitulating to the radicals again and again, as they open up new fronts and shift the frame of the debate.
In short, the issue was decided not by this latest proclamation, but by the endorsement of 'gay marriage;' this is just the natural result. If you really understood 'gay marriage,' you'd realize this really isn't making things much worse, because it was implicit already.
Imagine if someone bought tickets to a boxing match, and then went and got upset as soon as the fighters started boxing each other. You'd think they were a retard - that's the nature of the game, it's what you signed up for when you bought the tickets. Same for gay marriage - if you support it, and then start yelling about how the roles of mother and father are now being diminished - well, that was kind of inescapable.