G, Roissy's blog is about seduction. Widening the definition of alpha would mean obscuring the traits that make the alpha so seductive, and start counting things that only really men care about, things that won't get you laid. You'd have guys working on things that would yield no pussy return.
You could have done Nobel prize worthy work and still score no pussy for it.
I think you're taking the evolution bit a little far. We've always had these low-status lady killers, but they never prospered as much as they do now. And that's because women's sexuality is no longer fiercely guarded. No risk of pregnancy, she has her own place, STDs are nearly harmless, she's not married as soon as she moves out from the parents, pop culture glamorizes these men, she can screw hundreds of men and no one she knows will find out...
You could have done Nobel prize worthy work and still score no pussy for it.
Quote: (01-27-2012 04:18 PM)gringochileno Wrote:
We don't live in hunter-gatherer tribes anymore, so the traits that universally went together and were manifested in a single, identifiable leader of each group are no longer necessarily linked. There's no one constellation of traits that's going to capture every single person we intuitively identify as "alpha" in a satisfactory way.
I think you're taking the evolution bit a little far. We've always had these low-status lady killers, but they never prospered as much as they do now. And that's because women's sexuality is no longer fiercely guarded. No risk of pregnancy, she has her own place, STDs are nearly harmless, she's not married as soon as she moves out from the parents, pop culture glamorizes these men, she can screw hundreds of men and no one she knows will find out...