rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Holes in Roissy's Definition of The Alpha Male
#1

Holes in Roissy's Definition of The Alpha Male

I am kind of cringing posting this thread and starting another Alpha/Beta discussion.

However, I really like Roissy's Definition of an Alpha Male: http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2007/09/1...lpha-male/

It is clean. It is simple. It is easy. It is succinct.

(Plus, I like it because I fall somewhere between Alpha and Super Alpha on it, but that is neither here nor there).

The "hole" or issue I have with it, is when it comes to ranking Alphas.

By Roissy's definition, a kid in a boy band, is more Alpha than a guy like:






And a kid in a Vampire teen movie is more Alpha than a guy like this:






Because more people know the lame teens.

I think Roissy's definition puts too much emphasis on fame.

In my book an guy is way more Alpha, who is true to himself, is his own man, incorruptible and swoops fly girls VS some feminine dork who girls scream for.

Thoughts?

Should the Definition of an Alpha Male be more focused on attractiveness to girls AND admiration/other men wanting strive for some of your traits?

I think this is where the Pua mindset is all wrong. It is focused solely on girls.

I have always written about girls AND making yourself a better man.

I welcome Roissy to weigh in on this.
Reply


Messages In This Thread

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)