New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests
09-08-2015, 04:23 PMQuote: (09-08-2015 03:36 PM)kaotic Wrote:
Quote: (09-08-2015 03:24 PM)JohnnyR Wrote:
Quote: (08-17-2015 11:18 AM)Blackwell Wrote:
Quote: (08-17-2015 10:51 AM)Kaebs Wrote:
Quote: (08-16-2015 11:43 PM)Roosh Wrote:
1. It's getting forum members in trouble. This is a public forum that is read by white knights. It has happened that girls who were uploaded were identified and the member was confronted. In fact, a big case just happened the other week.
2. It can be used to hurt the forum. Our enemies can claim we are "violating the privacy" of girls we are intimate with. This recently happened in Poland with traveling youtube PUAs (not part of this forum) that gave a headache to us normal guys living there.
Did I miss something? What happened?
http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-46477.html
Sadly.
Wait. The dude plastered several chicks faces/bodies all over the internet, gets burnt, and then throws a sissy fit about white knights?
That's rich.
No he didn't plaster faces, they were censored.
Secondly, he didn't throw a sissy fit. He was more concerned about the girls he was still interested in another country, were hurt from it.
I think there was one he was especially interested in that got burned.
He was sharing his love of women with us and gave a world class guide on the countries he was banging in.
I'm thankful he did that, bummed he got caught.
It is what it is.
Oh get off his pole, will you?
The dude was bragging.
Fair enough - I do that a lot too. But I wouldn't create a little soap opera about the girl I "cared for" was hurt after I uploaded her pics to a forum of thirsty degenerates.
That IS rich.