Laurie Penny getting destroyed for defending vandalism against women's statue
05-10-2015, 09:25 AM
Currently there is mounting evidence that election is heavily manipulated since the pre-election support simply does not match the effective results. Polls are easily manipulated as well.
![[Image: CEe0pfoXIAEF-4o.jpg:large]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CEe0pfoXIAEF-4o.jpg:large)
Even if you have a candidate running nowadays who might change something, then you are certainly not getting him. I remember the Ron Paul action a couple of years ago where grassroots support of him was gigantic, but he was still not getting near the effective votes that he should have been receiving.
I am not even discussing his policies, which are faulty to the highest degree - just the fact that nowadays massive manipulation of voting results can be attained since fewer people are involved in compilation and computation of said votes. The more centralized it becomes the easier it gets until finally:
And the funny part is that it would not matter much which pre-selected candidate won - some just fit better to run through different goals on the agenda.
Even if you have a candidate running nowadays who might change something, then you are certainly not getting him. I remember the Ron Paul action a couple of years ago where grassroots support of him was gigantic, but he was still not getting near the effective votes that he should have been receiving.
I am not even discussing his policies, which are faulty to the highest degree - just the fact that nowadays massive manipulation of voting results can be attained since fewer people are involved in compilation and computation of said votes. The more centralized it becomes the easier it gets until finally:
And the funny part is that it would not matter much which pre-selected candidate won - some just fit better to run through different goals on the agenda.